USDA
LegacyCFBUSDA

League News

USDA
Sep 15, 2026 · 12:47 by @Swimfunk

USDA- Volume 4, September 2026

Featuring Raine

ARCH MANNING: TEXAS TAKES THE TOP SPOT

Texas has officially climbed to the top of the USDA rankings, and much of the spotlight belongs to quarterback Arch Manning. The Longhorns made a major statement against Ohio State, showing they have the talent and toughness to compete with the very best in the country. It was the kind of matchup that can define a season—and Texas came away looking like a legitimate national championship contender.

For Manning, the OSU game was another opportunity to prove he belongs among college football’s elite. With the pressure of playing for one of the sport’s biggest programs, every game carries enormous expectations. Manning’s ability to lead Texas against a powerhouse like Ohio State only adds to the hype surrounding his season and his growing status as the face of the Longhorns.

Now comes the real challenge: staying on top in the SEC, where there is no shortage of powerhouse programs waiting to knock Texas off its perch. The Longhorns have the talent to make a championship run, but they’ll have to survive a brutal conference schedule to get there. If Manning can continue to deliver when the pressure is highest, Texas has a real chance to finish the season as the USDA national champion.

Texas is No. 1. Arch Manning is the face. Now the Longhorns have to prove they belong at the top.

Sep 13, 2026 · 17:10 by @konrad_fitzgerald

🏈 USDA: THE MAGAZINE 🔮 WEEK 4 — WAY-TOO-EARLY RECRUITING CLASS PROJECTIONS

🏈 USDA: THE MAGAZINE

🔮 WEEK 4 — WAY-TOO-EARLY RECRUITING CLASS PROJECTIONS

The Leads Are Forming. The Visits Are Coming. And the Race for the Top Five Is About to Get Expensive.

Week 4 is where recruiting starts becoming real.

The boards have taken shape. Programs have established legitimate leads. Some blue chips have already gone verbal or committed. We can see who is concentrating resources at the very top of the board, who is spreading money across volume, who is protecting home territory and who is going into somebody else’s backyard trying to take premium talent.

And now comes the dangerous part:

Visit season.

A current lead is valuable.

It is not a signature.

A great visit can turn a close race into a recruitment another program can no longer realistically chase.

A poor visit can erase weeks of work.

And with so many of these schools fighting over the same players, a single flip can create a double swing in the projected rankings — one team gains the prospect while the former leader loses him.

So consider this the first true Way-Too-Early USDA Recruiting Projection.

📊 HOW THE PROJECTION WORKS

The complete Blue-Chip Report contains 343 ranked players.

The first 32 are five-stars.

Everyone from #33 through #343 is a four-star.

For this projection, every recruiting slot is weighted progressively.

#1 is worth slightly more than #2.

#2 is worth slightly more than #3.

And that continues all the way through #343.

There are no artificial cliff effects in the actual weighting. A player at #99 is slightly more valuable than #100, who is slightly more valuable than #101.

The familiar labels simply help us understand the quality of the board:

⭐ Five-Star — #1-32

💯 Top-100 4-Star — #33-100

📈 Top-247 4-Star — #101-247

🔹 Other 4-Star — #248-343

That distinction matters.

Three-stars remain the lifeblood of college football. They fill rosters, develop, become starters and frequently turn into stars.

But we’re trying to project recruiting rankings.

And recruiting rankings are driven at the top by blue-chip accumulation.

There is also a much bigger USDA consequence attached to this particular race.

🏆 TOP FIVE MATTERS

Securing a Top-5 recruiting class isn’t merely a trophy for the message board.

It can help open the path toward the Elite Recruiter tree.

That means an elite recruiting cycle can create advantages that affect recruiting cycles after it.

So being fifth instead of sixth may eventually mean much more than one position in the standings.

That’s why this race matters now.

🥇 1. USC

18 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 3 Five-Stars
💯 6 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 3 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 6 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #1 Ceiling | #6 Floor

If everything ended today, USC would have our projected No. 1 class.

And the Trojans aren’t getting there simply by piling up bodies.

Nine of USC’s 18 current leaders sit inside the national Top 100.

That means half of the current projected blue-chip class is Top-100 talent.

The Talent Hub Report already told us what USC’s recruiting philosophy looks like geographically.

They’re the only program currently leading prospects from California, Texas, Florida and Georgia.

California is still the foundation, but USC isn’t behaving like a program content to simply defend Los Angeles and call it a day.

This looks like a genuine national NIL strategy.

Likely NIL Focus

Protect the premium California players first.

Then selectively spend large amounts on national targets where USC believes it can win.

The catch is obvious.

If you’re actively involved in this many expensive recruitments, you have a lot of money and attention tied up simultaneously.

Visit Season

USC’s California leads will continue getting pressure from Oregon, Washington and national schools.

A strong run of visits could allow USC to start shutting doors.

A bad weekend or two could expose just how many expensive battles they’re juggling.

Ceiling: #1 — currently the best combination of elite talent, depth and geographic reach.

Floor: #6 — too much quality to disappear, but plenty of the board is still contested.

🥈 2. TEXAS

13 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 2 Five-Stars
💯 7 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 4 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 0 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #1 Ceiling | #7 Floor

Texas may have the cleanest board in USDA.

All 13 current Longhorn leaders are ranked inside the Top 247.

Not one falls below it.

Even more importantly:

Nine of 13 are Top 100.

That suggests a very clear resource strategy.

Texas isn’t using blue-chip volume just for the sake of volume.

They’re targeting expensive inventory.

Likely NIL Focus

High-end concentration.

Texas appears willing to spend heavily on a smaller number of nationally premium prospects rather than pad the board farther down the rankings.

And with 55 blue chips in Texas alone, they can afford to be selective.

The Longhorns don’t need everybody.

They need the players they believe are worth paying for.

The biggest opportunity remains at the very top of their own state.

Alabama currently leads both five-star Texas safeties.

Oklahoma leads the only five-star LT.

A&M leads another Texas five-star.

Texas leads five-star CB Vernon Troyer.

Visit Season

If Texas flips one or two of those major in-state battles while protecting its existing Top-100 group?

There is absolutely a path to No. 1.

But because Texas has almost no lower-ranked four-star padding underneath its elite board, losing a few premium players could hurt more than it would hurt a volume class.

Ceiling: #1

Floor: #7

🥉 3. ALABAMA

18 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 3 Five-Stars
💯 3 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 7 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 5 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #1 Ceiling | #7 Floor

USC and Alabama are tied for the most blue-chip leaders in USDA.

But Alabama’s path is completely different.

The Tide are raiding.

From the four major talent hubs alone, Alabama currently leads players from:

Texas

Florida

Georgia

And Alabama’s home state isn’t even one of those four hubs.

This may be the purest national NIL muscle class in the cycle.

Likely NIL Focus

Alabama appears willing to spend heavily on high-value defensive talent while still keeping enough resources distributed to build substantial class volume.

The biggest example remains Texas.

Alabama currently leads both five-star Texas safeties.

Those are not going to be cheap recruitments to defend.

Texas is going to keep pushing.

Visit Season

If Alabama can survive the coming visits and hold those Texas five-stars, this board is built to stay near the top.

But if the Longhorns or another school starts reclaiming some of those expensive raids, Alabama could lose recruiting value quickly.

Ceiling: #1

Floor: #7

4. TEXAS A&M

13 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 6 Five-Stars
💯 0 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 5 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #1 Ceiling | #9 Floor

This is the wildest board in USDA.

SIX FIVE-STARS.

Texas A&M currently leads:

#1

#8

#13

#17

#18

#23

Nobody else is close to that level of five-star concentration.

And those six players come from six different states.

That tells us everything about A&M’s early philosophy.

Likely NIL Focus

Whale hunting.

The Aggies appear willing to invest enormous resources into truly elite national targets rather than filling the top of their class with large numbers of Top-100 four-stars.

That’s why the board looks bizarre.

Six five-stars.

Then no additional Top-100 four-star leader.

The next current A&M lead after the five-star group doesn’t come until #106.

The Risk

How much NIL is being tied up protecting six enormously expensive recruitments at the same time?

Because once competitors begin bringing those players onto campus, the price of keeping all six could rise.

There is also the five-star QB issue.

A&M leads Mike Downs and David Reeves.

At some point, those recruitments could affect each other.

Does one become uncomfortable with the other?

Does another school use the depth chart against A&M?

Visit Season

A&M may have more to protect than anybody.

A great visit season could stabilize six five-star leads and make this the most frightening class in USDA.

A bad one could cause enormous movement.

Ceiling: #1

Floor: #9

A&M probably has the greatest variance among the elite classes.

5. OHIO STATE

13 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 3 Five-Stars
💯 4 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 3 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #2 Ceiling | #9 Floor

Ohio State currently sits in the most important position on the board.

Fifth.

The final projected Top-5 class.

And the Buckeyes’ five-star trio is absurdly valuable:

#3

#4

#11

That is elite placement even within the five-star tier.

Ohio State also has four more Top-100 four-stars.

Seven Top-100 players overall gives this board the premium depth you want from a true Top-5 class.

Likely NIL Focus

Selective national spending.

Ohio State’s elite board is heavily centered on premium prospects from the East and Northeast, while its major-hub success has included Texas and Florida.

This doesn’t look like indiscriminate volume.

It looks targeted.

Visit Season

The problem is the teams immediately behind Ohio State.

Notre Dame has more total blue-chip leaders.

Penn State has four five-stars.

Clemson has enormous Top-247 depth.

Ohio State is currently inside the door.

But the door is open.

Ceiling: #2

Floor: #9

🚨 THE ELITE RECRUITER CUT LINE

If recruiting froze today:

1. USC

2. Texas

3. Alabama

4. Texas A&M

5. Ohio State

Those are the five programs currently holding the spots everybody wants.

Then comes the pressure.

6. NOTRE DAME

14 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 1 Five-Star
💯 4 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 6 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #3 Ceiling | #10 Floor

Notre Dame is the first team out.

And this is a very dangerous No. 6.

Fourteen current blue-chip leaders is more than Texas, A&M or Ohio State.

Eleven are Top-247 players.

The Irish simply don’t have the five-star concentration of the teams above them.

Likely NIL Focus

Breadth.

Notre Dame appears to be spreading resources across a large national board of very good players instead of concentrating everything into a handful of five-star bidding wars.

That can create stability.

But it can also create a ceiling if the teams above you continue stacking elite players.

Visit Season

One major five-star flip could change everything.

Notre Dame already leads five-star CB Lee Nwaneri out of Georgia and is involved in several other premium recruitments.

This is the program most likely to make the current No. 5 team uncomfortable.

Ceiling: #3

Floor: #10

7. CLEMSON

11 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 1 Five-Star
💯 2 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 7 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #4 Ceiling | #11 Floor

Clemson’s board is quietly outstanding.

Ten of 11 current leaders are Top-247 prospects.

That is an incredibly high-quality floor.

And Clemson already has multiple blue-chip decisions in hand.

Likely NIL Focus

Regional efficiency.

Georgia.

Florida.

Nearby premium players.

Fewer wasted resources chasing every national battle available.

Clemson’s Talent Hub profile suggested the same thing: it has been incredibly efficient in Georgia and Florida.

That can matter as visit season gets heavier.

Shorter travel.

Familiar pipelines.

Easier repeat access.

Visit Season

Clemson may not have A&M’s superstar ceiling, but this could become one of the safest classes on the board if more of these current leads close.

Ceiling: #4

Floor: #11

8. PENN STATE

10 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 4 Five-Stars
💯 1 additional Top-100 4-Star
📈 4 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #3 Ceiling | #13 Floor

Penn State only has ten blue-chip leaders.

But four are five-stars.

Only Texas A&M has more.

And the identity of those five-stars matters.

Penn State is loading up on the defensive front.

EDGE.

EDGE.

EDGE.

DT.

Likely NIL Focus

Position-group dominance.

Rather than simply buying stars anywhere they can find them, Penn State appears to be investing premium resources into building a future defensive front.

That gives this class a coherent identity.

Visit Season

The downside is concentration risk.

Lose one five-star and you feel it.

Lose two and this projection falls quickly.

Close all four?

Penn State can absolutely threaten the Top Five.

Ceiling: #3

Floor: #13

9. LSU

13 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 2 Five-Stars
💯 1 additional Top-100 4-Star
📈 6 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 4 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #5 Ceiling | #14 Floor

LSU has volume.

What it lacks is enough of that volume at the very top.

Only three current LSU leaders are Top-100 prospects.

That’s why a 13-player board sits behind Penn State’s ten.

Likely NIL Focus

Balanced class construction.

LSU appears to be spending enough at the top to remain involved with stars, while also making sure the class doesn’t become dependent on two or three players.

The biggest battle remains Louisiana.

LSU leads one of the state’s two five-stars.

A&M leads the other.

Visit Season

If LSU flips five-star QB Mike Downs from A&M, it produces one of the biggest possible double swings in this ranking.

LSU gains a five-star.

A&M loses one.

That could move both teams.

Ceiling: #5

Floor: #14

10. FLORIDA

11 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 5 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 4 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #6 Ceiling | #14 Floor

No five-stars.

Still Top 10.

That’s impressive.

Florida’s entire profile matches what we saw in the Talent Hub Report.

Florida has 43 blue chips, but only one five-star.

So the Gators are playing the board they’re given.

Likely NIL Focus

Four-star accumulation.

Instead of throwing everything at a tiny five-star pool, Florida appears to be identifying the best four-stars in-state and stacking them.

Five Top-100 four-stars is excellent.

Visit Season

This class has less volatility than some of the five-star-heavy programs because its value isn’t tied to only one or two players.

Florida’s job now is to turn quantity into signatures.

Ceiling: #6

Floor: #14

11. ILLINOIS

11 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 2 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 7 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #7 Ceiling | #17 Floor

Illinois is one of the biggest surprises in the report.

Nine of its 11 current leaders are Top 247.

And its Talent Hub profile already showed an unusual amount of geographic diversity.

Likely NIL Focus

Spread the money.

Illinois appears to be avoiding the most expensive five-star wars and instead accumulating a large collection of strong four-star prospects.

That’s potentially very efficient.

If the whales are consuming huge portions of the budgets at the top programs, Illinois may be winning the players just beneath them.

Ceiling: #7

Floor: #17

12. OLE MISS

11 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 1 Five-Star
💯 1 additional Top-100 4-Star
📈 7 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #7 Ceiling | #17 Floor

Ole Miss has built an extremely deep Top-247 class.

Nine of the 11 current leaders fall inside the Top 247.

Likely NIL Focus

Strong four-star depth with one premium anchor.

That profile gives Ole Miss more stability than a class built entirely around a couple expensive stars.

The major upside remains Mississippi itself.

Ole Miss leads one of the state’s two five-stars.

Oregon leads the other.

Visit Season

Flip that second Mississippi five-star and Ole Miss could own the top of its home state while pushing toward the Top 10.

Ceiling: #7

Floor: #17

13. OKLAHOMA

11 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 2 Five-Stars
💯 0 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 5 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 4 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #6 Ceiling | #18 Floor

Oklahoma is another strange class.

Two five-stars at the top.

Then no other Top-100 four-star leaders.

The Sooners are doing most of their major-hub damage in Texas.

Likely NIL Focus

Premium anchors plus Texas value.

Oklahoma appears willing to pay heavily for a handful of true elite targets, then work the enormous Texas four-star pool beneath them.

The centerpiece is five-star LT Brent Lemon.

He is the only five-star left tackle in the class.

Scarcity usually costs money.

Visit Season

Texas, A&M and Alabama are not going to stop fighting for elite Texas talent.

Oklahoma will have to defend its position.

Ceiling: #6

Floor: #18

14. TCU

8 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 2 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 5 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #9 Ceiling | #20 Floor

Seven of TCU’s eight current leaders are Top 247.

That’s a very clean board.

Likely NIL Focus

Value accumulation in Texas.

TCU doesn’t need to outbid the giants for every five-star.

With 55 blue chips in-state, there is enormous value in simply owning the second layer while Texas, A&M, Alabama and Oklahoma fight at the top.

Ceiling: #9

Floor: #20

15. INDIANA

8 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 2 Five-Stars
💯 1 additional Top-100 4-Star
📈 2 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #7 Ceiling | #22 Floor

Eight blue chips doesn’t sound overwhelming.

Then you look at the first two.

#7

#9

Indiana currently leads two Top-10 five-stars.

That changes everything.

Likely NIL Focus

Top-heavy by necessity.

If you’re Indiana and you’re leading two prospects ranked inside the national Top 10, those are the recruitments you protect first.

Everything else comes second.

And the potential five-star QB/WR pairing could become the foundation of an entire offense.

Visit Season

This class is highly sensitive.

Close both stars and Indiana could dramatically outperform its total volume.

Lose one and the ranking can slide quickly.

Ceiling: #7

Floor: #22

16. GEORGIA

10 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 2 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 5 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #9 Ceiling | #22 Floor

Georgia is one of the most intriguing situations in USDA.

Ten current blue-chip leaders is healthy.

But none are five-stars.

And Georgia currently leads none of the four five-stars produced by Georgia.

That’s the issue.

Likely NIL Focus

So far, the Bulldogs have built depth rather than winning the most expensive battles at home.

That may change.

Because watching Alabama, A&M, Notre Dame and Clemson lead Georgia five-stars is probably not something this program can tolerate forever.

Visit Season

If Georgia begins reclaiming even one or two of those home-state elites, this projection changes quickly.

Ceiling: #9

Floor: #22

17. MICHIGAN

10 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 1 Top-100 4-Star
📈 6 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #10 Ceiling | #23 Floor

Michigan has a sturdy board.

Seven of its ten leaders are Top-247 players.

Likely NIL Focus

Balanced developmental recruiting.

Michigan isn’t currently throwing huge weight at the five-star layer.

Instead, it’s stacking good four-stars and betting on development.

The floor is respectable.

The ceiling requires a few more elite wins.

Ceiling: #10

Floor: #23

18. WASHINGTON

7 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 1 Top-100 4-Star
📈 5 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #11 Ceiling | #25 Floor

Six of Washington’s seven current leaders are Top 247.

That’s stronger than the raw total suggests.

Likely NIL Focus

Western expansion.

Washington has repeatedly shown up in California recruiting battles.

The Huskies clearly want Southern California to function as an extension of their territory.

Visit Season

Washington may not want to win every battle purely through NIL.

Visits, fit and early playing time could be especially important when going head-to-head with USC and Oregon.

Ceiling: #11

Floor: #25

19. UCLA

10 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 7 Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #12 Ceiling | #24 Floor

UCLA has one of the most fascinating board shapes.

Ten blue-chip leaders.

Zero Top-100 players.

That’s why the Bruins aren’t ranked higher.

Likely NIL Focus

Own the middle of California.

USC may be spending more aggressively at the very top.

UCLA appears to be cleaning up the next tier.

And its California conversion has been outstanding.

There is a very reasonable strategy here:

Let somebody else overpay for five-stars. Stack four-stars. Develop them.

But if UCLA wants to crack the recruiting Top 10, it probably needs a couple higher-ranked wins.

Ceiling: #12

Floor: #24

20. TENNESSEE

6 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 1 Five-Star
💯 2 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 1 additional Top-247 4-Star
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #11 Ceiling | #27 Floor

Tennessee doesn’t have much volume.

What it has is quality at the top.

Three of its six leaders are Top 100.

And one is five-star QB Lorenzo Lockridge.

Likely NIL Focus

Georgia.

Tennessee’s Talent Hub activity makes the strategy obvious.

Nine appearances on Georgia blue-chip boards.

Four current Georgia hub leads.

Tennessee is trying to make Georgia feel like part of its recruiting footprint.

Visit Season

Because the class is small, every high-end battle matters enormously.

Close the top.

Add volume later.

Ceiling: #11

Floor: #27

21. OREGON

7 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 1 Five-Star
💯 2 additional Top-100 4-Stars
📈 2 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #9 Ceiling | #28 Floor

Oregon remains the ultimate access versus conversion team.

The Ducks show up everywhere.

California.

Texas.

Five-star boards.

But the current number of actual leads doesn’t match the opportunity set.

Likely NIL Focus

National aggression.

Oregon clearly isn’t afraid to spend outside its home market.

The problem isn’t finding recruitments.

It’s finishing them.

Visit Season

This could be one of the fastest-rising teams on the board if the Ducks begin turning seconds and thirds into firsts.

Ceiling: #9

Floor: #28

22. MISSOURI

8 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 1 Top-100 4-Star
📈 3 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 4 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #14 Ceiling | #28 Floor

Missouri has quietly accumulated useful four-star volume.

Half the current leaders are outside the Top 247, which limits the ranking upside today.

Likely NIL Focus

Depth over star chasing.

A few higher-ranked wins could move Missouri substantially because the base is already there.

Ceiling: #14

Floor: #28

23. TEXAS TECH

7 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 2 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 3 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #14 Ceiling | #29 Floor

Texas Tech has five leaders inside the Top 247.

And unlike some other Texas schools, Tech has shown meaningful activity in Florida and Georgia too.

Likely NIL Focus

Home-state value with selective Southeast expansion.

The biggest challenge is obvious.

There are a lot of rich programs shopping in Texas.

Tech doesn’t need to win every luxury battle.

It needs to keep winning enough of the strong middle tier.

Ceiling: #14

Floor: #29

24. FLORIDA STATE

7 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 2 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 2 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #13 Ceiling | #29 Floor

Florida State has four current leaders inside the Top 247.

Its overall profile is solid rather than spectacular.

But the in-state situation is promising.

FSU has been far more productive in Florida than Miami.

Likely NIL Focus

Defend Florida first.

Then selectively leave the state.

If Florida State continues converting locally while Miami struggles, it can become the primary in-state challenger to Florida.

Ceiling: #13

Floor: #29

25. GEORGIA TECH

5 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 3 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 0 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #15 Ceiling | #31 Floor

Georgia Tech is one of the weirdest classes on the board.

Only five leaders.

Three are Top 100.

Likely NIL Focus

Concentration.

If Georgia Tech is going to have a small blue-chip board, it appears determined to make the top of that board expensive.

This is the opposite of volume recruiting.

Ceiling: #15

Floor: #31

26. NEBRASKA

6 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 2 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 1 additional Top-247 4-Star
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #18 Ceiling | #32 Floor

Two Top-100 players give Nebraska some legitimate quality at the top.

But half of the projected blue-chip class sits outside the Top 247.

Likely NIL Focus

Selective premium spending with development bets underneath.

The next step is adding more middle-tier blue-chip depth.

Ceiling: #18

Floor: #32

27. BYU

5 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 1 Top-100 4-Star
📈 1 additional Top-247 4-Star
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #19 Ceiling | #33 Floor

BYU’s board is small, but the California pipeline has been one of the interesting subplots of the hub report.

Likely NIL Focus

Western value hunting.

Rather than trying to beat USC and Oregon for every superstar, BYU is finding individual California battles it believes it can win.

Ceiling: #19

Floor: #33

28. AUBURN

6 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 3 Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 3 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #19 Ceiling | #34 Floor

Auburn has six leaders but lacks a Top-100 headliner.

Its Talent Hub profile shows activity across Florida, Georgia and Texas.

Likely NIL Focus

Broad regional depth.

The access is there.

Now Auburn needs a premium win to move the ranking needle.

Ceiling: #19

Floor: #34

29. LOUISVILLE

3 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 1 Top-100 4-Star
📈 2 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 0 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #21 Ceiling | #35 Floor

Only three blue-chip leaders.

But all three are Top 247.

That gives Louisville a much better quality profile than the raw volume suggests.

Likely NIL Focus

Small board, quality targets.

The obvious need now is simply more volume.

Ceiling: #21

Floor: #35

30. MICHIGAN STATE

3 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 3 Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 0 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #22 Ceiling | #36 Floor

Three leaders.

All three Top 247.

That’s a clean but tiny board.

Likely NIL Focus

Quality before quantity.

Michigan State needs more blue-chip opportunities before it can realistically move much higher.

Ceiling: #22

Floor: #36

31. ARKANSAS

3 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 1 Top-100 4-Star
📈 1 additional Top-247 4-Star
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #22 Ceiling | #37 Floor

Arkansas has one player in every four-star tier.

Interesting balance.

Not enough volume.

Likely NIL Focus

A premium swing at the top with value underneath.

More wins are needed to turn this into a meaningful rankings class.

Ceiling: #22

Floor: #37

32. MINNESOTA

4 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 2 Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #23 Ceiling | #38 Floor

Minnesota has managed to pull blue-chip leads out of difficult Southern territory.

That’s notable.

Likely NIL Focus

Selective out-of-region opportunities.

The ranking upside remains limited until Minnesota adds a Top-100 type.

Ceiling: #23

Floor: #38

33. UTAH

3 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 2 Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #24 Ceiling | #39 Floor

Utah has two solid Top-247 leaders.

The board is simply too small right now.

Likely NIL Focus

Targeted value rather than volume.

Ceiling: #24

Floor: #39

34. VIRGINIA TECH

2 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 2 Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 0 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #25 Ceiling | #39 Floor

Only two.

But both are Top 247.

Likely NIL Focus

Extremely concentrated board.

Virginia Tech needs additional wins more than it needs better quality from the two already there.

Ceiling: #25

Floor: #39

35. MIAMI

2 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 1 Top-100 4-Star
📈 0 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #20 Ceiling | #40 Floor

This remains one of the biggest early stories.

Miami sits inside a state with:

43 BLUE CHIPS

Yet the Hurricanes currently lead only two blue chips nationally in this entire report — and only one from Florida’s major hub board.

That’s simply not enough.

Likely NIL Focus

Hard to read yet because there isn’t enough conversion.

Miami has access.

The Hurricanes appear on boards.

They simply aren’t finishing first often enough.

The Swing Recruitment

Five-star RB Nick Cota.

A&M currently leads.

Miami is right there.

Flip Cota and the entire perception of this class changes.

That’s why Miami’s ceiling remains far higher than No. 35.

Visit Season

Few programs need a great visit stretch more.

Miami has too much talent sitting nearby to remain this low.

Ceiling: #20

Floor: #40

36. KENTUCKY

2 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 1 Top-247 4-Star
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #27 Ceiling | #40 Floor

Kentucky needs more volume.

One Top-247 leader gives the class a start.

Nothing more yet.

Ceiling: #27

Floor: #40

37. IOWA

3 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 1 Top-247 4-Star
🔹 2 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #28 Ceiling | #41 Floor

Iowa has three current blue-chip leaders, but only one is inside the Top 247.

Likely NIL Focus

Development-oriented blue-chip depth.

A higher-ranked win would matter tremendously.

Ceiling: #28

Floor: #41

38. VIRGINIA

2 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 1 Top-247 4-Star
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #29 Ceiling | #41 Floor

Two blue-chip leaders.

One Top 247.

This is still a very early foundation.

Ceiling: #29

Floor: #41

39. SOUTH CAROLINA

2 Blue-Chip Leaders

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 1 Top-100 4-Star
📈 0 additional Top-247 4-Stars
🔹 1 other 4-Star

Projected Range: #30 Ceiling | #41 Floor

South Carolina at least has a Top-100 piece.

That’s valuable.

The other current leader is all the way at #343, which shows how thin the class currently is.

Likely NIL Focus

One premium target, then developmental value.

More volume is needed quickly.

Ceiling: #30

Floor: #41

40. NC STATE

1 Blue-Chip Leader

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 1 Top-247 4-Star
🔹 0 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #32 Ceiling | #41 Floor

One current blue-chip leader.

At #214.

There simply isn’t enough board yet to project much higher.

Visit season needs to create new opportunities.

Ceiling: #32

Floor: #41

41. MISSISSIPPI STATE

1 Blue-Chip Leader

⭐ 0 Five-Stars
💯 0 Top-100 4-Stars
📈 1 Top-247 4-Star
🔹 0 other 4-Stars

Projected Range: #33 Ceiling | #41 Floor

One current blue-chip leader at #217.

That’s the smallest current footprint in the projection.

But this part of the rankings can move quickly.

A couple four-star wins can take a program from No. 41 into the 30s almost immediately.

Ceiling: #33

Floor: #41

📋 THE FULL WEEK 4 PROJECTION

1. USC
2. Texas
3. Alabama
4. Texas A&M
5. Ohio State

6. Notre Dame
7. Clemson
8. Penn State
9. LSU
10. Florida

11. Illinois
12. Ole Miss
13. Oklahoma
14. TCU
15. Indiana

16. Georgia
17. Michigan
18. Washington
19. UCLA
20. Tennessee

21. Oregon
22. Missouri
23. Texas Tech
24. Florida State
25. Georgia Tech

26. Nebraska
27. BYU
28. Auburn
29. Louisville
30. Michigan State

31. Arkansas
32. Minnesota
33. Utah
34. Virginia Tech
35. Miami

36. Kentucky
37. Iowa
38. Virginia
39. South Carolina
40. NC State
41. Mississippi State

👑 THE FIVE-STAR ARMS RACE

Texas A&M — 6

Penn State — 4

USC — 3
Alabama — 3
Ohio State — 3

Texas — 2
LSU — 2
Indiana — 2
Oklahoma — 2

Notre Dame — 1
Oregon — 1
Ole Miss — 1
Clemson — 1
Tennessee — 1

A&M’s six remain the defining outlier.

But Penn State’s four are enough to make that class extremely dangerous.

💯 TOP-100 POWER

Counting five-stars and Top-100 four-stars together:

USC — 9

Texas — 9

Ohio State — 7

Alabama — 6

Texas A&M — 6

Notre Dame — 5

Penn State — 5

Florida — 5

That explains a lot about the top of the projection.

Texas and USC aren’t simply accumulating recruits.

They’re accumulating expensive recruits.

💰 THE NIL PERSONALITIES ARE STARTING TO EMERGE

If we assume what naturally makes sense — that recruiting costs generally rise as the player ranking rises — then these classes already appear to be following different economic models.

THE WHALE HUNTERS

Texas A&M

Penn State

Indiana

These schools are concentrating enormous value in a smaller number of elite players.

The upside is enormous.

So is the volatility.

THE PREMIUM PORTFOLIOS

USC

Texas

Ohio State

Multiple five-stars plus extensive Top-100 depth.

These may be the most expensive classes from top to bottom, but they’re also less dependent on any single player.

THE NATIONAL RAIDERS

Alabama

USC

Texas A&M

These programs aren’t simply recruiting where geography gives them an advantage.

They’re repeatedly entering other programs’ talent hubs and winning.

Those battles tend to get expensive.

THE VOLUME BUILDERS

Florida

Clemson

Illinois

UCLA

TCU

Less dependence on five-stars.

More four-star accumulation.

Potentially a more efficient use of NIL if those evaluations are correct.

THE REGIONAL ASSASSINS

Oklahoma → Texas

Tennessee → Georgia

Clemson → Georgia/Florida

BYU → California

These programs have identified specific outside markets and are trying to turn them into extensions of home territory.

✈️ NOW COMES THE PART THAT CAN BREAK THE MODEL

The projection assumes today’s leader eventually wins.

We know that isn’t going to happen everywhere.

Heavy visit season is beginning.

And visits can change everything.

A great visit can:

Strengthen a current lead.

Push a player toward committing.

Make a recruit comfortable enough to stop shopping.

Give a school the confidence to redirect NIL and recruiting resources elsewhere.

A poor visit can do the exact opposite.

And because these rankings are weighted, not all flips are equal.

If Texas flips one of Alabama’s five-star safeties?

Texas gains massive value.

Alabama loses massive value.

If LSU flips Mike Downs from Texas A&M?

LSU rises.

A&M falls.

If Georgia reclaims one of its home-state five-stars?

Georgia gains the elite piece it’s missing while Notre Dame, Clemson, Alabama or A&M loses one.

If Miami flips Nick Cota?

Miami suddenly gets the headline recruit its class desperately needs while A&M loses one of the six pillars holding up the most top-heavy class in USDA.

If Oregon starts winning some of the California fights where it’s currently hanging around?

USC, Washington and others could feel it.

These aren’t isolated decisions anymore.

They’re ranking swings.

🚨 THE TOP-FIVE PRESSURE LINE

Today:

1. USC

2. Texas

3. Alabama

4. Texas A&M

5. Ohio State

Then:

6. Notre Dame

7. Clemson

8. Penn State

9. LSU

10. Florida

That’s the race to watch.

USC currently has the best overall blend.

Texas has perhaps the cleanest premium board.

Alabama has massive volume and may be the best pure raider.

A&M owns the highest five-star ceiling.

Ohio State currently has the last seat at the Elite Recruiter table.

Notre Dame is standing directly behind the chair.

Penn State has enough elite talent to kick the door down.

Clemson may have the most stable quietly excellent class in the country.

And LSU and Florida are close enough that one elite weekend could reshape the conversation.

Nobody is being crowned in Week 4.

But the money is being allocated.

The territories are being defined.

The expensive recruitments are starting to separate from the normal ones.

And now the visits begin.

The first month built the board.

The next month may decide who can actually close it.

Sep 13, 2026 · 12:15 by @konrad_fitzgerald

USDA S1 Blue Chip Hub Report - California, Florida, Georgia, & Texas

🏈 USDA: THE MAGAZINE

🗺️ THE S1 BLUE-CHIP TALENT HUB REPORT

162 Blue Chips. Four Superstates. 34 Programs with Current Leads. And a Recruiting Map That Is Already Exposing Who Wants to Build Through the Nation’s Richest Talent Areas.

The Five-Star Report told us who the crown jewels are.

The Talent Hub Report tells us something broader:

Where are USDA programs actually trying to build their rosters?

Across California, Florida, Georgia and Texas, there are 162 blue-chip prospects.

That is enough talent to shape not just one recruiting class, but the competitive structure of the league for years.

And once we move beyond the five-stars, the recruiting landscape becomes much more revealing.

Some schools are clearly trying to dominate home.

Some are targeting neighboring states.

Some are using one major hub almost like a second recruiting base.

And a small group of programs — notably USC and Texas A&M — are appearing across multiple elite regions, suggesting an intentional effort to build nationally from the country’s deepest talent pools.

There are also some early warning signs.

Miami is not currently converting Florida at the level you would expect.

Georgia is heavily involved at home but is being invaded at an extraordinary rate.

Oregon keeps getting into major California recruitments without winning many of them yet.

Texas is strong across the depth of its own state, but the five-star layer is much more fragmented.

UCLA may quietly be having one of the best home-state recruiting starts in USDA.

And perhaps most importantly:

There isn’t one universal way to win these hubs.

Texas rewards market share.

Florida rewards evaluation and volume.

Georgia rewards the ability to defend your borders.

California rewards elite retention.

This is the first full map of where USDA talent lives — and who is actually getting to it.

📊 THE FOUR SUPERSTATES

The four identified Blue-Chip Hubs contain:

162 total blue-chip prospects

Broken down:

TEXAS — 55

5 Five-Stars
50 Four-Stars

FLORIDA — 43

1 Five-Star
42 Four-Stars

GEORGIA — 35

4 Five-Stars
31 Four-Stars

CALIFORNIA — 29

5 Five-Stars
24 Four-Stars

Their share of the four-hub market:

Texas — 34.0%

Florida — 26.5%

Georgia — 21.6%

California — 17.9%

More than one-third of all the talent in this report comes from Texas alone.

But raw volume isn’t the whole story.

💎 FIVE-STAR CONCENTRATION

Here’s where the states begin to look completely different.

California

5 of 29 blue chips are five-stars.

17.2%

Georgia

4 of 35.

11.4%

Texas

5 of 55.

9.1%

Florida

1 of 43.

2.3%

That is an enormous gap.

California has the smallest total blue-chip pool but the highest concentration of truly elite prospects.

Florida has 14 more blue chips than California — but California has five times as many five-stars.

So a recruiter approaching California and a recruiter approaching Florida should not be thinking the same way.

California is about protecting and landing the top.

Florida is about mining the enormous four-star middle.

🏠 WHO IS ACTUALLY PROTECTING HOME?

Using the first-listed school as the current leader:

TEXAS

Texas-based programs currently lead 28 of 55 prospects.

That includes:

Texas — 10
Texas A&M — 7
TCU — 6
Texas Tech — 5

That’s a slim majority.

But at the five-star level, only 2 of 5 are currently led by an in-state school.

So Texas is doing a much better job controlling its depth than controlling its absolute elite tier.

CALIFORNIA

USC and UCLA currently lead:

13 of 29 prospects

USC — 6
UCLA — 7

That’s not a majority of the entire pool, but the five-star picture is much stronger.

USC leads:

3 of California’s 5 five-stars

And is involved with a fourth.

So California has the best current home-state five-star defense.

FLORIDA

Florida, Florida State and Miami currently lead:

15 of 43 prospects

Florida — 9
Florida State — 5
Miami — 1

That’s only 34.9%.

And the lone five-star?

A&M currently leads Miami.

So Florida has substantial local activity, but outsiders are currently winning most of the first-place positions.

GEORGIA

Georgia and Georgia Tech currently lead:

6 of 35 prospects

Georgia — 5
Georgia Tech — 1

That’s only 17.1%.

Outside programs currently lead 26.

Three prospects remain OPEN.

And all four Georgia five-stars currently have outside leaders.

No hub is being invaded more heavily.

🤠 TEXAS

55 BLUE CHIPS

THE MARKETPLACE

Texas isn’t simply the biggest hub.

It’s almost its own recruiting ecosystem.

Fifty-five blue chips means that several programs can recruit Texas aggressively and all come away with valuable classes.

That’s exactly what’s happening.

The state currently has significant activity from:

Texas.

Texas A&M.

TCU.

Texas Tech.

Oklahoma.

Alabama.

Ohio State.

USC.

LSU.

SMU.

And many more.

The real question isn’t:

Who owns Texas?

It’s:

Who gets the largest and most valuable slice?

⭐ THE TEXAS FIVE

Texas’ five five-stars currently point toward four different programs:

CB Vernon Troyer → Texas

LT Brent Lemon → Oklahoma

DT Miguel Trapasso → Texas A&M

FS Chuck Faulk → Alabama

SS Chuck Landry → Alabama

That means Alabama currently leads as many Texas five-stars as Texas and Texas A&M combined.

That’s one of the most striking elite-tier numbers in the entire report.

🤘 TEXAS

THE DEEPEST LOCAL FOOTPRINT

Texas appears on:

17 of 55 Texas boards

and currently leads:

10

Both are the highest totals in the state.

The Longhorns may not currently dominate the five-star layer, but they are involved everywhere underneath it.

Texas is leading or battling for:

linebackers,

running backs,

athletes,

tight ends,

receivers,

edges,

defensive backs,

offensive linemen.

This is why the Texas story shouldn’t be reduced to one five-star lead.

The Longhorns are doing substantial roster-building work.

The challenge is adding more elite wins at the top.

👍 TEXAS A&M

BUILD HOME — HUNT NATIONAL

A&M’s hub profile is one of the most interesting in USDA because it looks different from Coach Bone’s five-star profile.

In Texas:

12 appearances

7 current leaders

That includes five-star DT Miguel Trapasso.

A&M also already has:

a Texas four-star ATH verbal

and

a Texas four-star WR committed

So while Coach Bone’s five-star board stretches across Oregon, Florida, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama and Texas, his broader blue-chip foundation is much more concentrated at home.

That creates a very coherent strategy:

Use Texas to build the class.

Use national NIL reach to elevate the class.

That’s a much more sustainable model than attempting to build the entire roster from national five-star battles.

And it explains why A&M shows up in this report even when it’s not the most active program in every hub.

The Aggies don’t need 10 Florida recruits.

They may only need Nick Cota.

They don’t need 10 Georgia recruits.

They may only need Kane Shackelford.

The national work is selective.

The Texas work provides volume.

🐸 TCU

THE FOUR-STAR VOLUME PLAY

TCU appears on:

12 Texas boards

and currently leads:

6

That’s as many appearances as A&M.

And TCU’s activity is almost entirely built around the massive four-star layer.

RB.

WR.

MLB.

QB.

ATH.

CB.

OLB.

RT.

That’s smart recruiting in a state with 50 four-stars.

TCU does not need to win the five-star headline battle to build a blue-chip roster.

It just needs to keep stacking wins in the middle.

🌵 TEXAS TECH

THE SAME MARKET, ANOTHER STRONG PLAYER

Texas Tech has:

11 appearances

5 current leads

The Red Raiders keep showing up at:

QB.

WR.

CB.

OLB.

DT.

RB.

And more.

Again, this is why Texas is so different.

Five local programs can recruit heavily inside the state without exhausting the supply.

And that’s before Oklahoma and Alabama arrive.

🅾️ OKLAHOMA

THE MOST EFFECTIVE OUT-OF-STATE TEXAS RAIDER

Oklahoma appears on:

9 Texas boards

and currently leads:

7

That’s outstanding early conversion.

The biggest is:

five-star LT Brent Lemon

But Oklahoma also leads Texas prospects at:

RT.

MLB.

EDGE.

CB.

DT.

another MLB.

The Sooners aren’t dabbling in Texas.

They’re building there.

And geographically, it makes perfect sense.

Texas functions almost like an extension of Oklahoma’s home market.

🐘 ALABAMA

THE ELITE TEXAS RAID

Alabama appears on:

8 Texas boards

and currently leads:

6

Two of those are five-stars:

Chuck Faulk.

Chuck Landry.

That’s an extraordinary early showing for a program located far outside the state.

And unlike Oklahoma, Alabama cannot simply explain this through proximity.

This is national recruiting power.

If Alabama eventually closes most of these six, Texas becomes one of the defining pillars of the Tide’s S1 class.

⚠️ SMU: PRESENT, BUT NOT YET FIRST

SMU appears on three Texas boards.

Current leads:

Zero

That doesn’t mean those recruitments are lost.

But in a state where TCU and Texas Tech are already converting significant volume, SMU’s current position matters.

If SMU wants to use Texas as its primary source of blue-chip talent, the next step has to be turning involvement into first place.

📍 EVERY SCHOOL REPRESENTED IN TEXAS

Texas — 17 appearances, 10 current leads

Texas A&M — 12, 7

TCU — 12, 6

Texas Tech — 11, 5

Oklahoma — 9, 7

Alabama — 8, 6

USC — 4, 2

LSU — 4, 0

SMU — 3, 0

Ohio State — 3, 3

Utah — 3, 1

BYU — 2, 0

Minnesota — 2, 1

Oregon — 1, 0

Washington — 1, 0

Florida State — 1, 1

Auburn — 1, 0

UCLA — 1, 0

Georgia Tech — 1, 0

Illinois — 1, 1

Iowa — 1, 1

And:

4 Texas blue chips remain OPEN

Twenty-one programs represented.

That’s why Texas is the recruiting stock exchange of USDA.

🌴 FLORIDA

43 BLUE CHIPS

THE FOUR-STAR GOLD MINE

Florida has:

43 blue chips

but:

only one five-star

That means:

42 four-stars

or 97.7% of the state’s blue-chip pool.

No other hub is shaped like that.

Florida is where you go when you want to build depth.

And because there are so many four-stars, a coach who evaluates correctly can potentially build a stronger roster here than a coach who spends the same amount of resources chasing one or two five-stars somewhere else.

👑 NICK COTA

ONE PLAYER CARRIES THE FIVE-STAR STORY

Florida’s only five-star:

RB Nick Cota

Current board:

Texas A&M

Miami

The irony couldn’t be sharper.

Florida produces 43 blue chips.

Yet its only five-star is currently led by a school from Texas.

And the only local challenger is Miami.

That brings us directly to one of the most interesting early hub situations.

🌴 MIAMI

THE EARLY FLORIDA CONCERN

Miami appears on:

5 Florida blue-chip boards

Current leaders:

1

That lone current lead is a four-star ATH.

Miami is also chasing Nick Cota.

But compared with Florida and Florida State, the Hurricanes’ early in-state conversion is clearly lagging.

Florida has:

9 current Florida leaders

Florida State has:

5

Miami has:

1

That’s a meaningful early gap.

And this is Miami we’re talking about.

A program located in one of the richest recruiting states in the country should theoretically have tremendous access.

The problem isn’t that Miami isn’t on boards.

It is.

The problem is that it’s currently sitting behind somebody else on four of the five Florida recruitments in which it appears.

That’s worth watching.

🌴 WHAT WOULD CHANGE THE MIAMI STORY?

One name:

Nick Cota.

If Miami flips the state’s only five-star from Texas A&M, the entire narrative softens.

Suddenly Miami can say:

We kept Florida’s only five-star home.

And he happens to be the only five-star RB nationally.

That’s a gigantic win.

But if Cota leaves and Miami remains around one or two Florida leads?

Then the question becomes much more serious:

Why isn’t Miami getting more traction in one of the nation’s deepest blue-chip states?

It’s too early for alarm.

It is absolutely not too early to notice.

🐊 FLORIDA

WINNING THE FOUR-STAR GAME

Florida has:

11 appearances

9 current leads

The Gators lead the state in both meaningful categories.

And three of those four-star leads are already verbals:

RB.

OLB.

LG.

That is exactly how you should attack a class where 42 of 43 blue chips are four-stars.

Florida isn’t chasing headlines.

It’s stacking volume.

If those leads hold, the Gators may end up with one of the strongest hub-based classes in USDA without ever landing the state’s lone five-star.

🍢 FLORIDA STATE

A VERY EFFICIENT START

Florida State:

6 appearances

5 leads

That’s excellent.

Current leaders include:

RT.

SS.

DT.

EDGE.

CB.

There is a noticeable defensive tilt.

And FSU is converting at a much higher rate than Miami despite only one additional appearance.

Again, early board.

But the comparison is hard to ignore.

🐶 GEORGIA

RAIDING FLORIDA WHILE DEFENDING GEORGIA

Georgia appears on:

8 Florida boards

and currently leads:

3

That’s more Florida involvement than Florida State or Miami.

Think about that.

Georgia is dealing with massive pressure at home.

Yet the Bulldogs are simultaneously one of the most active programs in Florida.

This is a perfect example of how national recruiting actually works.

Georgia isn’t merely protecting.

It’s counterattacking.

🐘 ALABAMA

DEEP SOUTH WITHOUT BORDERS

Alabama:

6 Florida appearances

4 current leads

Two already have status:

a committed FS.

a verbal WR.

Add Alabama’s major activity in Georgia and Texas, and a pattern appears.

The Tide aren’t building from one hub.

They’re trying to stitch several elite southern markets together into one recruiting footprint.

🐅 CLEMSON

SMALL BOARD, HIGH CONVERSION

Clemson appears on:

3 Florida boards

and leads:

2

Both are verbals:

CB.

DT.

That’s important.

Clemson doesn’t have Florida’s largest board.

But it has already converted two opportunities into actual decisions.

Volume is valuable.

Closure is better.

📍 EVERY SCHOOL REPRESENTED IN FLORIDA

Florida — 11 appearances, 9 leads

Georgia — 8, 3

Alabama — 6, 4

Florida State — 6, 5

Miami — 5, 1

Auburn — 4, 2

Illinois — 3, 1

Ole Miss — 3, 3

Clemson — 3, 2

Texas A&M — 2, 2

Texas Tech — 2, 2

Minnesota — 2, 1

Georgia Tech — 2, 1

USC — 2, 2

Ohio State — 1, 1

Nebraska — 1, 0

Virginia — 1, 1

Iowa — 1, 0

Oklahoma — 1, 1

Plus:

2 OPEN prospects

Nineteen programs represented.

🍑 GEORGIA

35 BLUE CHIPS

THE BATTLEGROUND

Georgia might be the most fascinating hub in the entire report.

It isn’t the biggest.

It isn’t the deepest.

But nobody’s borders are under more pressure.

Thirty-five blue chips.

Four five-stars.

And every five-star currently has a different outside leader.

Carl Everett → Alabama

Lee Nwaneri → Notre Dame

Kane Shackelford → Texas A&M

Thad Summers → Clemson

Georgia itself leads none.

That is remarkable.

🐶 GEORGIA

ACTIVE, BUT UNDER SIEGE

Georgia appears on:

10 Georgia boards

Current leads:

5

That’s tied for the most current Georgia leads with Clemson.

So this is not a story about Georgia being absent.

Quite the opposite.

Georgia is the most active program in the state.

But the Bulldogs currently have a major difference between:

overall presence

and

elite control

They lead several four-stars.

They already have a four-star CB verbal.

But all four five-stars currently point somewhere else.

That’s the tension.

🍊 TENNESSEE

THE NEIGHBOR WHO WON’T LEAVE

Tennessee appears on:

9 Georgia boards

Only one fewer than Georgia itself.

That is an enormous number.

Tennessee currently leads:

4

And the Volunteers appear at:

five-star CB.

five-star DT.

WR.

another WR.

ATH.

RT.

TE.

CB.

OLB.

This isn’t selective raiding.

It’s an attempt to make Georgia part of Tennessee’s recruiting infrastructure.

If that strategy works long-term, it becomes a major problem for Georgia.

🍊 TENNESSEE’S REAL IMPACT IS BIGGER THAN FOUR LEADS

Even if Tennessee doesn’t close all nine?

The Vols matter.

Every battle forces somebody else to spend resources.

Georgia has to defend.

Clemson has to defend.

Alabama has to defend.

Notre Dame has to defend.

That has downstream effects.

Tennessee can influence the entire hub simply by remaining a credible threat on this many players.

And if those four current leads become signatures?

Then this stops being disruption.

It becomes ownership of a meaningful slice of Georgia.

🐅 CLEMSON

THE MOST EFFICIENT GEORGIA INVADER

Clemson:

5 appearances

5 current leads

Perfect on the current snapshot.

That includes:

five-star RT Thad Summers

And two of Clemson’s four-star Georgia leaders are already committed/verballed.

This may be one of the best hub performances in the entire report.

Clemson isn’t fighting for everyone.

It’s fighting for five.

And currently winning all five.

☘️ NOTRE DAME

A NORTHERN PROGRAM BUILDING SOUTHERN ACCESS

Notre Dame appears on:

4 Georgia boards

and currently leads:

3

The headline is five-star CB Lee Nwaneri.

But the broader board matters.

Notre Dame has multiple Georgia opportunities.

That suggests this isn’t merely one superstar recruitment.

The Irish are trying to establish actual access to Georgia.

🐘 ALABAMA

THE FIRST FIVE-STAR IS ALREADY GONE

Alabama appears on:

4 Georgia boards

and leads:

3

The biggest:

Carl Everett — five-star LB — verbal

So the first five-star decision in USDA came from Georgia.

And it went to Alabama.

That’s the kind of result that makes every remaining Georgia five-star battle feel more urgent for the Bulldogs.

👍 A&M

QUALITY OVER QUANTITY

A&M appears on just:

1 Georgia blue-chip board

But it’s:

Kane Shackelford — five-star DT

And A&M leads.

This is important when discussing which schools are “active” in hubs.

Not every national recruiter is trying to blanket every state.

A&M’s approach outside Texas appears much more selective.

When Bone goes into Georgia, he’s not necessarily chasing eight four-stars.

He’s chasing one of the state’s four five-stars.

That is a very different kind of national strategy than USC’s.

📍 EVERY SCHOOL REPRESENTED IN GEORGIA

Georgia — 10 appearances, 5 leads

Tennessee — 9, 4

Clemson — 5, 5

Alabama — 4, 3

Notre Dame — 4, 3

Indiana — 3, 1

Minnesota — 3, 0

Auburn — 3, 2

USC — 2, 1

Miami — 2, 0

Nebraska — 2, 2

Ole Miss — 1, 0

Texas A&M — 1, 1

Florida State — 1, 0

Georgia Tech — 1, 1

Michigan — 1, 0

TCU — 1, 1

Michigan State — 1, 1

Arkansas — 1, 1

Ohio State — 1, 0

Texas Tech — 1, 1

Plus:

3 OPEN prospects

Twenty-one programs represented.

🌴 CALIFORNIA

29 BLUE CHIPS

THE WESTERN KINGDOM

California has fewer blue chips than any of the four hubs.

But the talent is disproportionately elite.

Five of the 29 are five-stars.

That’s:

17.2%

And the in-state recruiting picture has a fascinating split.

USC owns the headline.

UCLA owns the volume.

✌️ USC

THE ELITE GATEKEEPER

USC has:

8 California appearances

6 current leads

The most appearances of any program in the state.

Three current leads are five-stars:

Tymon Kamara.

Frank Duvall.

Marco Smith.

USC also appears on Sam Willy’s board.

So the Trojans are either leading or involved with:

4 of California’s 5 five-stars

That’s outstanding elite control.

But USC’s significance goes beyond California.

We’ll get to that.

🐻 UCLA

THE QUIETLY RIDICULOUS CALIFORNIA START

UCLA has:

7 California appearances

7 current leads

Every California recruit UCLA currently appears on has UCLA listed first.

And four already carry a verbal or commitment designation:

OLB — verbal.

CB — committed.

WR — verbal.

WR — verbal.

That’s an extraordinary start.

USC has the glamorous five-star board.

UCLA may currently have the more secure four-star foundation.

If this continues, California could produce two excellent local recruiting classes built in completely different ways.

✌️ USC VS UCLA

THE CEILING VS THE FLOOR

USC currently leads:

6 California blue chips.

UCLA leads:

But USC’s six include three five-stars.

UCLA’s seven are all four-stars, with four already verbally committed/committed.

That’s one of the best contrasts in the entire report.

USC is building the ceiling.

UCLA is building the floor.

Neither approach is inherently superior.

If USC closes the elite names, that’s enormous.

If UCLA keeps piling up four-stars and turning them into actual commitments, that’s how roster depth gets built.

🦆 OREGON

HIGH ACCESS, LOW CURRENT CONVERSION — AGAIN

Oregon appears on:

5 California boards

Current leads:

1

This is exactly what we saw in the Five-Star Report.

The Ducks are getting into the right recruitments.

They just aren’t currently listed first often enough.

Sam Willy.

Frank Duvall.

Marco Smith.

Other four-stars.

The opportunities are there.

California could determine whether Oregon’s national recruiting profile becomes a major success story or an example of being close without closing.

🏔️ WASHINGTON

ANOTHER NORTHERN THREAT

Washington also appears on:

5 California boards

and leads:

2

The Huskies are involved at:

QB.

ATH.

EDGE.

WR.

EDGE.

Washington and Oregon together are forcing USC and UCLA to defend the West from the north.

This is becoming a regional recruiting war, not just a collection of individual recruitments.

🤘 TEXAS

THE BIGGEST OUTSIDE PRESENCE IN CALIFORNIA

Texas appears on:

7 California boards

and currently leads:

3

That’s tied with UCLA for the second-most appearances behind USC.

The Longhorns currently lead five-star QB Hugh Morris plus two California four-star receivers.

That’s a serious western footprint.

Texas is not merely defending its own gigantic market.

It’s actively shopping California too.

⛪ BYU

A SNEAKY GOOD CALIFORNIA OPERATION

BYU has:

4 California appearances

3 current leads

Those are primarily offensive skill players.

That’s a very strong small sample.

BYU isn’t showing up in the five-star headline discussion.

But the Cougars are extracting quality four-star talent from California at a very efficient rate.

📍 EVERY SCHOOL REPRESENTED IN CALIFORNIA

USC — 8 appearances, 6 leads

Texas — 7, 3

UCLA — 7, 7

Washington — 5, 2

Oregon — 5, 1

Notre Dame — 4, 1

BYU — 4, 3

Utah — 3, 0

LSU — 2, 1

Indiana — 2, 1

Illinois — 2, 1

Penn State — 1, 1

Tennessee — 1, 0

Louisville — 1, 1

TCU — 1, 1

Fifteen programs represented.

No California blue chip is currently listed OPEN.

That tells you how aggressively the state is already being recruited.

🌎 THE NATIONAL HUB HUNTERS

WHO IS DELIBERATELY BUILDING FROM THE BEST STATES?

This may be the most important addition to the report.

Which programs aren’t simply recruiting one hub?

Which programs are showing up repeatedly across several?

That’s where you begin to see true national class-building strategies.

✌️ USC

THE ONLY PROGRAM IN ALL FOUR HUBS

USC is represented in:

California

Florida

Georgia

Texas

No other program appears in all four.

Across those hubs:

16 total appearances

11 current leads

USC’s footprint includes:

8 California appearances.

2 Florida.

2 Georgia.

4 Texas.

That tells us something very clear.

USC’s class is not simply “California plus whatever happens nationally.”

The Trojans are actively shopping every one of the four major talent hubs.

California is the foundation.

But Florida, Georgia and Texas are part of the plan.

That makes USC the broadest hub-diversified recruiter in USDA.

👍 TEXAS A&M

THREE HUBS — PLUS A FIVE-STAR NATIONAL NETWORK

A&M appears in:

Texas

Florida

Georgia

Across the four hub report:

15 appearances

10 current leads

Twelve appearances come from Texas.

That tells us where the volume lives.

But the other three are extremely high-value:

Florida includes five-star Nick Cota.

Georgia includes five-star Kane Shackelford.

And then the Five-Star Report adds national leaders from Oregon, Louisiana and Alabama outside these four hubs.

So A&M’s model differs from USC’s.

USC broadly recruits all four hubs.

A&M recruits Texas heavily, then cherry-picks premium targets nationally.

Both are national strategies.

They simply arrive there differently.

🐘 ALABAMA

THREE HUBS, 13 CURRENT LEADS

Alabama is represented in:

Florida.

Georgia.

Texas.

Total:

18 appearances

13 current leaders

That ties Texas for the most current hub leads in the entire report.

And unlike Texas, most of Alabama’s activity is happening outside its own state.

That’s remarkable.

Alabama is arguably the strongest pure hub raider in USDA.

Five-star Georgia LB already verbal.

Two Texas five-star safeties currently led.

Four Florida leaders.

Alabama is building across the South’s deepest external talent bases.

🐶 GEORGIA

ATTACKING FLORIDA WHILE DEFENDING HOME

Georgia has:

18 total hub appearances

8 leads

across:

Florida.

Georgia.

The Bulldogs’ map is more regional than national.

But 8 Florida appearances show Georgia isn’t sitting back and simply trying to protect home.

It’s attempting to draw heavily from another elite neighboring market.

That matters because Georgia’s own state is being attacked just as aggressively.

🤘 TEXAS

THE MOST TOTAL HUB INVOLVEMENT

Texas appears on:

24 hub boards

the most of any program.

Current leads:

13

Most naturally come from Texas.

But seven appearances come from California.

That’s not incidental.

Texas is using the country’s two westernmost mega-hubs — Texas and California — as its primary blue-chip foundation.

And the Longhorns currently lead a five-star California quarterback.

That’s a national class-building approach even if most of the volume still comes from home.

🐸 TCU AND 🌵 TEXAS TECH

STAY HOME AND EAT

Both appear on:

14 total hub boards

Both lead:

8

Their activity is overwhelmingly Texas-based.

And that’s completely rational.

You don’t need to build a four-state national recruiting network when your backyard contains 55 blue chips.

For these programs, concentrating resources may be smarter than spreading them.

There’s a difference between national reach and unnecessary travel.

🐅 CLEMSON

TWO HUBS, INCREDIBLE EFFICIENCY

Clemson appears in:

Florida.

Georgia.

Total:

8 appearances

7 current leads

That’s one of the highest current conversion profiles among programs operating across multiple hubs.

And Clemson has already moved several of those prospects into verbal/commitment territory.

The Tigers aren’t everywhere.

They’re just winning almost everywhere they go.

🐊 FLORIDA STATE

THREE-HUB PRESENCE

Florida State appears in:

Florida.

Georgia.

Texas.

Total:

8 appearances

6 leads

Most activity comes from Florida, but FSU has also stepped into Georgia and Texas.

That’s a broader footprint than the five-star board alone would suggest.

🟠 AUBURN

QUIETLY PRESENT IN THREE HUBS

Auburn appears across:

Florida.

Georgia.

Texas.

8 appearances

4 leads

Auburn isn’t dominating any individual hub.

But the Tigers are present across three of them.

That’s worth tracking because a class can become nationally diverse without ever having one massive state-specific headline.

🟠 ILLINOIS

AN UNEXPECTED THREE-HUB FOOTPRINT

Illinois appears in:

California.

Florida.

Texas.

6 appearances

3 leaders

That’s quietly impressive geographic breadth.

Illinois is not recruiting the same volume as USC or Alabama, but appearing in three of the country’s premier talent states is notable.

👀 THE PROGRAM THAT STANDS OUT FOR THE WRONG REASON

MIAMI

Miami appears across:

Florida.

Georgia.

Seven total hub recruitments.

Current leads:

1

That’s one of the largest gaps between hub activity and current first-place position among notable programs.

And because Miami’s home state is Florida, the imbalance matters more.

Five Florida appearances.

One lead.

Two Georgia appearances.

Zero leads.

The Hurricanes have access.

The early results aren’t there.

Nick Cota could change the conversation immediately.

But absent that, Miami is one of the clearest programs to monitor in the next update.

🦆 OREGON

ANOTHER ACCESS-TO-CONVERSION QUESTION

Oregon appears in:

California.

Texas.

Six hub appearances.

Current leads:

1

Again, this mirrors the Five-Star Report.

Oregon is getting invited into major recruiting battles.

But the current lead count remains low.

That’s becoming a consistent theme across both reports.

It may simply mean Oregon’s board is difficult and national.

Or it may eventually become evidence that the Ducks are spreading resources too broadly.

We don’t know yet.

But it is absolutely a trend worth tracking.

🏔️ WASHINGTON

WESTERN EXPANSION, LIMITED CURRENT RETURNS

Washington appears in:

California.

Texas.

Six hub boards.

Current leads:

2

Most of Washington’s activity is in California, which makes strategic sense.

The Huskies are attempting to turn the West Coast into a shared recruiting territory.

The access is there.

The next step is increasing conversion.

🧭 MULTI-HUB ACTIVITY LEADERBOARD

Programs represented in multiple hubs:

Texas — 24 appearances | 13 leads | 2 hubs

Alabama — 18 | 13 | 3 hubs

Georgia — 18 | 8 | 2 hubs

USC — 16 | 11 | 4 hubs

Texas A&M — 15 | 10 | 3 hubs

TCU — 14 | 8 | 3 hubs

Texas Tech — 14 | 8 | 3 hubs

Tennessee — 10 | 4 | 2 hubs

Oklahoma — 10 | 8 | 2 hubs

Notre Dame — 8 | 4 | 2 hubs

UCLA — 8 | 7 | 2 hubs

Auburn — 8 | 4 | 3 hubs

Florida State — 8 | 6 | 3 hubs

Clemson — 8 | 7 | 2 hubs

Miami — 7 | 1 | 2 hubs

Minnesota — 7 | 2 | 3 hubs

LSU — 6 | 1 | 2 hubs

Washington — 6 | 2 | 2 hubs

Oregon — 6 | 1 | 2 hubs

BYU — 6 | 3 | 2 hubs

Illinois — 6 | 3 | 3 hubs

Utah — 6 | 1 | 2 hubs

Indiana — 5 | 2 | 2 hubs

Ohio State — 5 | 4 | 3 hubs

Ole Miss — 4 | 3 | 2 hubs

Georgia Tech — 4 | 2 | 3 hubs

Nebraska — 3 | 2 | 2 hubs

Iowa — 2 | 1 | 2 hubs

This is one of the cleanest ways to distinguish recruiting philosophy.

Some programs are extremely concentrated.

Others are building coast-to-coast boards.

🏆 THE NATIONAL HUB-BUILDING TIERS

If we classify these strategies by what the data is actually showing:

TRUE FOUR-HUB NATIONAL RECRUITER

USC

The only school touching all four.

HIGH-VOLUME THREE-HUB RECRUITERS

Alabama

Texas A&M

TCU

Texas Tech

Auburn

Florida State

The caveat: TCU and Texas Tech’s totals are heavily Texas-driven, while Alabama and A&M show more meaningful cross-state diversity.

SELECTIVE THREE-HUB RECRUITERS

Illinois

Minnesota

Ohio State

Georgia Tech

Lower total volume, but they are reaching into multiple premier regions.

DOMINANT REGIONAL CONCENTRATORS

Texas

Georgia

Oklahoma

Clemson

UCLA

These schools are not necessarily trying to be everywhere.

They’re extracting a lot of value from one or two markets.

That’s often just as effective.

🤯 THE MOST INTERESTING CROSS-HUB CONTRASTS

USC vs A&M

This might be the cleanest example of two national strategies that look completely different.

USC:

Broad.

All four hubs.

16 appearances.

California foundation.

Selective but real activity in Florida, Georgia and Texas.

A&M:

Concentrated.

15 appearances.

12 in Texas.

Then premium five-star raids elsewhere.

USC is building a wide network.

A&M is building a home base with elite satellites.

Both could work.

Alabama vs Texas

Both currently lead:

13 hub prospects

But they got there differently.

Texas is mostly winning in Texas.

Alabama is winning in other people’s states.

That’s an incredible contrast.

Texas represents home-market dominance.

Alabama represents national raiding power.

UCLA vs Oregon

Both recruit California heavily.

UCLA:

7 appearances.

7 leads.

Oregon:

5 appearances.

1 lead.

That’s the current difference between access and conversion in one state.

And four UCLA California leaders are already committed/verballed.

Georgia vs Tennessee

Georgia:

10 Georgia appearances.

5 leads.

Tennessee:

9 Georgia appearances.

4 leads.

This is almost a dead-even recruiting war inside Georgia’s own borders.

That’s extraordinary.

Florida State vs Miami

Florida State:

6 Florida appearances.

5 leads.

Miami:

5 Florida appearances.

1 lead.

Nearly identical opportunity volume.

Very different current results.

That’s one of the most important local comparisons in the report.

🔐 EARLY CLOSERS

Across the four hubs, there are:

21 prospects already listed as verbal or committed

By hub:

California — 5

UCLA — 4
Indiana — 1

Florida — 8

Florida — 3
Alabama — 2
Clemson — 2
Georgia — 1

Georgia — 4

Clemson — 2
Alabama — 1
Georgia — 1

Texas — 4

Texas A&M — 2
Oklahoma — 1
Ohio State — 1

Florida is moving fastest.

California’s early decisions are overwhelmingly UCLA.

Georgia is already seeing elite talent leave.

Texas still has huge amounts of undecided inventory.

🔓 OPEN BLUE CHIPS

Texas — 4

Georgia — 3

Florida — 2

California — 0

Nine total.

California being at zero is notable.

Every blue chip has already attracted at least one program.

Texas has four OPEN players despite having 21 programs represented in the state.

That’s just another demonstration of its size.

Georgia’s three are especially interesting because the rest of the state is under such intense pressure.

Smart recruiters may be able to find value while everybody else fights over the obvious names.

📈 STOCK UP — HUB EDITION

UCLA

Seven California opportunities.

Seven leads.

Four early decisions.

One of the best starts in the entire report.

CLEMSON IN GEORGIA

Five appearances.

Five leads.

Five-star RT included.

Two early closures.

Outstanding efficiency.

OKLAHOMA IN TEXAS

Nine appearances.

Seven leads.

An aggressive and productive Texas operation.

ALABAMA

Thirteen current leaders across the hubs.

Major success in Texas, Georgia and Florida.

Arguably the most successful outside raider.

FLORIDA

Nine Florida leaders.

Three verbals.

The Gators are exploiting their state’s four-star depth.

USC

Only program in all four hubs.

Controls California’s elite tier while recruiting nationally.

TEXAS A&M

Seven Texas leaders plus premium targeted raids outside the state.

A clear “home base + national stars” model.

⚠️ PRESSURE WATCH

MIAMI

Five Florida opportunities.

One lead.

Florida State has nearly identical volume and five leads.

That gap is currently significant.

Cota can change everything.

GEORGIA’S ELITE HOME DEFENSE

Ten total in-state appearances and five overall leads.

But zero of Georgia’s four five-stars currently favor Georgia.

That’s the problem to solve.

OREGON

Strong access in California and nationally.

Very limited current conversion.

This is now a repeated pattern across both USDA recruiting reports.

SMU IN TEXAS

Three Texas appearances.

Zero leads.

With TCU and Texas Tech already taking major pieces of the four-star market, SMU needs to establish some traction.

LSU IN THE HUBS

Six appearances across California and Texas.

Only one current leader.

The Five-Star Report looks stronger because LSU’s biggest victories are coming outside these hubs, but within the four major talent states, there’s room for improvement.

🧠 THE STRATEGIC LESSON FROM EACH STATE

TEXAS — PRIORITIZE

There are too many players to chase everyone.

The winner is probably the program that identifies the right 10–15 and closes them.

Trying to “own Texas” is almost impossible.

Owning your portion is realistic.

FLORIDA — EVALUATE

Forty-two four-stars.

That means stars are going to emerge from the middle of this board.

The best recruiter may not be the one landing the most recognizable name today.

It may be the one who correctly identifies which four-stars become tomorrow’s stars.

GEORGIA — DEFEND

Everybody is coming.

Tennessee.

Clemson.

Alabama.

Notre Dame.

A&M.

USC.

Auburn.

Indiana.

The challenge is not discovering Georgia talent.

Everyone already knows it’s there.

The challenge is keeping enough of it home.

CALIFORNIA — ESTABLISH HIERARCHY

USC owns the elite layer.

UCLA owns significant four-star depth.

Oregon and Washington are trying to break in.

Texas is selectively raiding from across the country.

California is a battle over who gets first choice.

🔮 WHAT THE NEXT REPORT MUST ANSWER

Does Miami recover inside Florida?

Does Nick Cota become the recruitment that changes the entire Hurricanes narrative?

Can Florida keep converting its huge four-star board?

Does Florida State maintain one of the best local conversion rates?

Can Georgia reclaim one of its four five-stars?

Does Tennessee actually convert its enormous Georgia presence?

Can Clemson remain perfect on the Georgia prospects it targets?

Does Alabama close its Texas safety pair?

Can Oklahoma maintain seven current Texas leads?

Can Texas’ broad home-state presence produce more five-star wins?

Does A&M continue building locally while Coach Bone hunts nationally?

Can UCLA finish its remarkable California start?

Does USC maintain California’s five-star ceiling while continuing to touch all four major hubs?

Do Oregon and Washington finally begin turning West Coast access into victories?

And perhaps the broadest question:

Which recruiting philosophy actually wins?

The national net?

The home-state fortress?

The selective raid?

The four-star volume strategy?

The five-star hunt?

We now have examples of all of them.

🏁 THE USDA S1 TALENT MAP

The first Blue-Chip Hub Report gives us much more than four totals.

It gives us recruiting identities.

Texas is the marketplace.

55 players.

Twenty-one programs represented.

Local schools still control most of the total board, but outsiders are hitting the elite tier hard.

Florida is the mine.

43 players.

Only one five-star.

This state will reward evaluation and volume.

Florida is winning the local four-star fight.

Florida State is converting efficiently.

Miami has early work to do.

Georgia is the battlefield.

35 players.

Four five-stars.

Four outside five-star leaders.

Georgia and Tennessee are nearly matching each other in total activity.

Clemson is converting at a remarkable rate.

Everybody is crossing the border.

California is the kingdom.

29 players.

Five five-stars.

USC controls the top.

UCLA is piling up the four-star layer.

Oregon and Washington want in.

Texas has already established meaningful national reach.

And then there are the programs whose recruiting maps transcend any one hub.

USC is the only school represented in all four.

Texas A&M is using Texas as its foundation while selectively hunting elite players elsewhere.

Alabama may be USDA’s most aggressive successful raider.

Texas has the greatest total hub involvement.

Clemson and UCLA are showing how devastating targeted efficiency can be.

Miami and Oregon remind us that being involved is not the same thing as being first.

That’s the biggest lesson of this entire report.

Getting into the recruitment matters.

Getting the lead matters more.

Getting the commitment matters most.

And right now, USDA’s richest talent states are giving us all three stages at once.

162 BLUE CHIPS.

FOUR SUPERSTATES.

DOZENS OF PROGRAMS CROSSING BORDERS.

AND NOT ONE OF THEM IS TRULY SAFE.

Having talent in your backyard is one thing.

Building your class from it — while keeping everybody else out — is the real fight.

Sep 13, 2026 · 11:45 by @konrad_fitzgerald

USDA S1 5 Star Report

Featuring Bone

🏈 USDA: THE MAGAZINE

⭐ THE S1 FIVE-STAR REPORT

32 Five-Stars. 16 States. 21 Programs in the Hunt. One Verbal. And a National Recruiting War Already Beginning to Take Shape.

The first USDA Five-Star Report of the CFB27 era is here.

And before most of these players have made their decisions, the board is already telling us quite a bit about what S1 recruiting could become.

There are 32 five-star prospects spread across 16 states. Twenty-one different programs appear somewhere on their boards. Fourteen schools currently hold at least one lead.

Only one of the 32 — Georgia LB Carl Everett — is listed as a verbal commitment.

That means 96.9% of the five-star class remains uncommitted based on the current report.

So this isn’t a signing-day ranking.

It’s a snapshot of the battlefield.

And there are already distinct recruiting identities emerging.

Texas A&M has gone national.

Penn State appears to be constructing an entire defensive front.

Ohio State has concentrated an incredible amount of talent near the very top of the rankings.

USC is protecting California’s elite tier better than any other major home-state power.

Alabama has the only five-star verbal and is attacking two of America’s richest recruiting states.

Indiana is threatening to pair a Top-10 five-star quarterback with a Top-10 five-star receiver.

Oregon is seemingly everywhere — but now needs to turn extraordinary access into more first-place finishes.

And beneath the school-by-school battles is a national geography that may prove just as important.

Texas and California produce the most five-stars.

New Jersey has somehow become an elite defensive-line factory.

Louisiana’s two five-stars are split between LSU and an A&M raid.

Mississippi’s only two five-stars are both receivers.

And more than half of USDA’s five-star class comes from outside the four major blue-chip hubs of Texas, California, Georgia and Florida.

The names are important.

But the patterns behind them may tell us even more.

Welcome to the first USDA Five-Star Report.

📊 THE FIVE-STAR BOARD — BY THE NUMBERS

Let’s establish the baseline.

32 Five-Star Prospects

16 States Represented

21 Programs Appearing on at Least One Five-Star Board

14 Programs Currently Leading at Least One

1 Verbal Commitment

That lone verbal belongs to:

#6 Carl Everett — LB — Georgia → Alabama

So just 3.1% of the five-star class has reached verbal status.

The other 31 prospects remain uncommitted according to the board supplied.

That distinction matters throughout this report.

A current leader is not a commitment.

A second-place program is not eliminated.

And with so little of the board actually settled, some of today’s biggest stories could look completely different by the next report.

👑 CURRENT FIVE-STAR LEADERBOARD

If every five-star signed with his current leader today:

Texas A&M — 6

Penn State — 4

Ohio State — 3

Alabama — 3

USC — 3

Texas — 2

LSU — 2

Indiana — 2

Oklahoma — 2

Notre Dame — 1

Oregon — 1

Ole Miss — 1

Clemson — 1

Tennessee — 1

The first number that jumps off the page:

Texas A&M currently leads 6 of 32 five-stars — 18.75% of the entire class.

Penn State controls another 12.5%.

And the five programs currently leading at least three — A&M, Penn State, Ohio State, Alabama and USC — combine to lead:

19 of the 32 five-stars — 59.4%.

So while 14 programs currently have at least one leader, nearly 60% of the five-star board is presently concentrated among five programs.

But there’s another way to measure recruiting power.

Who is simply getting into the most elite battles?

That’s where things become even more interesting.

🌐 FIVE-STAR ACCESS REPORT

Who keeps getting into the room?

Counting every appearance on a five-star contender list:

Texas A&M — 7

Alabama — 7

Oregon — 7

Texas — 7

USC — 6

Ohio State — 5

Penn State — 5

Notre Dame — 5

Georgia — 5

Washington — 4

LSU — 4

Indiana — 3

Ole Miss — 3

Miami — 3

Oklahoma — 3

Tennessee — 3

Iowa — 2

BYU — 1

Florida State — 1

Michigan — 1

Clemson — 1

That produces one of the most revealing comparisons in this entire report.

Four programs are tied with seven five-star appearances:

Texas A&M.

Alabama.

Oregon.

Texas.

But their current results are wildly different.

Texas A&M: 7 appearances, 6 leads

Alabama: 7 appearances, 3 leads

Texas: 7 appearances, 2 leads

Oregon: 7 appearances, 1 lead

That’s not a prediction of where they finish.

It’s simply the clearest illustration of the difference between access and current conversion.

All four are recruiting at the elite level.

Right now, one is turning almost every opportunity into first-place position.

📈 THE CURRENT CONVERSION SNAPSHOT

Again, this isn’t an official efficiency metric. Different recruitments have different margins and circumstances.

But purely comparing current leads against total five-star appearances:

Texas A&M — 6 of 7

Penn State — 4 of 5

Indiana — 2 of 3

Oklahoma — 2 of 3

Ohio State — 3 of 5

LSU — 2 of 4

USC — 3 of 6

Alabama — 3 of 7

Texas — 2 of 7

Notre Dame — 1 of 5

Oregon — 1 of 7

Georgia — 0 of 5

Washington — 0 of 4

Miami — 0 of 3

This is why Oregon remains one of the most fascinating programs on the entire board.

The Ducks don’t have an access problem.

They have seven five-star opportunities.

Their next challenge is turning more of those opportunities into leads.

Meanwhile, A&M’s early conversion has been extraordinary.

🧬 THE POSITIONAL DNA OF THE CLASS

USDA’s 32 five-stars break down like this:

QB — 6

DT — 5

WR — 5

CB — 3

EDGE — 3

RT — 2

LB — 2

FS — 2

RB — 1

LT — 1

ATH — 1

SS — 1

Quarterback is the deepest elite position.

Six of the 32 five-stars are QBs.

That’s 18.75% of the entire class.

Add five defensive tackles and five wide receivers, and those three positions account for:

16 of the 32 five-stars — exactly 50%.

Half of the entire five-star class is concentrated at quarterback, defensive tackle and wide receiver.

That’s good news for programs needing those positions.

Elsewhere?

Scarcity arrives quickly.

💎 SCARCITY WATCH

There is no Plan B at five stars

Only one five-star exists at each of these positions:

RB — #8 Nick Cota

LT — #14 Brent Lemon

ATH — #22 Marco Smith

SS — #30 Chuck Landry

That adds another layer of importance to those recruitments.

Miss on a five-star QB?

There are five others.

Miss on Nick Cota?

There isn’t another five-star running back.

Miss on Brent Lemon?

There isn’t another five-star left tackle.

The ranking matters.

But scarcity matters too.

🎯 THE SIX FIVE-STAR QUARTERBACKS

Quarterback is the headliner position of S1.

The six:

#9 Sherrod Angerer — Indiana → Indiana leads

#10 Tymon Kamara — California → USC leads

#13 Mike Downs — Louisiana → Texas A&M leads

#18 David Reeves — Alabama → Texas A&M leads

#29 Lorenzo Lockridge — North Carolina → Tennessee leads

#32 Hugh Morris — California → Texas leads

Five programs currently control the six leads.

Only one has two:

Texas A&M.

That’s another wrinkle in the Aggies’ recruiting story.

A&M isn’t merely leading six five-stars.

Two are quarterbacks.

And they’re coming from two different SEC recruiting territories:

Louisiana and Alabama.

If both eventually sign, the Aggies could have an embarrassment of riches at the most important position on the field.

But it also raises a future question worth monitoring:

Can you actually keep two five-star quarterbacks in the same recruiting class?

Does one recruitment eventually affect the other?

Does one become the clear priority?

We don’t have those answers yet.

But A&M’s current position creates the possibility.

🧱 THE FIVE-STAR DEFENSIVE TACKLES

There are five:

#3 Brad Zimmerman — New Jersey → Ohio State

#17 Kane Shackelford — Georgia → Texas A&M

#19 Theo Hyde — New Jersey → Penn State

#23 Miguel Trapasso — Texas → Texas A&M

#26 Kion Willie — Kansas → LSU

A&M is the only program currently leading two.

That means the Aggies could potentially come out of this class with two of the five elite interior defenders while simultaneously leading two of the six five-star quarterbacks.

That’s a potentially enormous roster-building haul at two premium positions.

🗺️ THE FIVE-STAR MAP

The state distribution:

Texas — 5

California — 5

Georgia — 4

New Jersey — 3

Louisiana — 2

New York — 2

Mississippi — 2

And one each from:

Oregon

Virginia

Pennsylvania

Florida

Indiana

Oklahoma

Alabama

Kansas

North Carolina

That’s 16 states.

And perhaps the most important geographic statistic:

The four major blue-chip hubs — Texas, California, Georgia and Florida — produce:

15 of the 32 five-stars — 46.9%.

Meaning:

17 of 32 — 53.1% — come from outside those four mega-hubs.

That’s an important distinction between overall blue-chip recruiting and five-star recruiting.

A program can build enormous depth in one of the superstates.

But if you want to dominate the very top of this class?

You have to travel.

Which brings us to the program sitting atop the board.

👍 TEXAS A&M

“HE’S GOT THE WHOLE WORLD… WELL, NATION… IN HIS HANDS.”

Coach Bone’s five-star map has almost no borders.

If the first USDA Five-Star Report needs a cover story, Coach Bone and Texas A&M are it.

Not because A&M has signed six five-stars.

It hasn’t.

Not because the race is over.

It absolutely isn’t.

But because no other current board combines volume, geographic reach and first-place positioning like Bone’s.

A&M appears in seven five-star recruitments.

It currently leads six.

That’s an 85.7% current lead rate among the five-star boards on which A&M appears.

And those six leaders come from:

Six different states.

🌎 THE BONE MAP

Coach Bone’s current five-star leaders:

#1 Naz Tam — RT — Oregon

#8 Nick Cota — RB — Florida

#13 Mike Downs — QB — Louisiana

#17 Kane Shackelford — DT — Georgia

#18 David Reeves — QB — Alabama

#23 Miguel Trapasso — DT — Texas

Oregon.

Florida.

Louisiana.

Georgia.

Alabama.

Texas.

That is not a pipeline.

That’s a national network.

And the seventh A&M appearance is:

#14 Brent Lemon — LT — Texas

The only five-star LT in the class.

So every single five-star recruitment on Bone’s current board involves a premium player, and six of the seven currently have A&M sitting first.

💰 BONE’S NIL FOOTPRINT

Different state. Same pitch.

This is what makes the A&M story so intriguing from an NIL-recruiting perspective.

Bone isn’t relying solely on Texas’ enormous talent base.

He’s using A&M’s resources and recruiting appeal to extend outward from it.

The current board says:

Go to Oregon for the nation’s No. 1 player.

Go to Florida for the country’s only five-star running back.

Go into LSU’s backyard for a five-star quarterback.

Go into Georgia for a five-star defensive tackle.

Go into Alabama for another five-star quarterback.

Then come home to Texas for another five-star DT.

That’s why the cover line works:

“He’s got the whole world… well, nation… in his hands.”

At least right now, Bone’s five-star recruiting strategy doesn’t appear to recognize regional boundaries.

But there’s a challenge embedded inside that strategy too.

National boards are expensive to defend.

Being first today means everyone else is chasing you tomorrow.

Oregon wants Tam back.

Miami wants Cota.

LSU wants Downs.

USC, Florida State and Tennessee are chasing Shackelford.

Georgia and Alabama want Reeves.

USC wants Trapasso.

And Alabama, Texas and Oklahoma are among the programs fighting around A&M’s Texas interests.

Bone has created an extraordinary board.

Now he has to defend it.

👑 #1 NAZ TAM

The recruitment that can validate the entire national strategy

Naz Tam is the No. 1 player in USDA.

RT — Oregon

Current board:

Texas A&M

Oregon

Washington

Iowa

There’s something almost too perfect about the country’s No. 1 recruit being the centerpiece of A&M’s national story.

Tam lives in Oregon.

Oregon wants him.

Washington wants him.

Yet Texas A&M currently sits first.

If Oregon closes, it’s the ultimate home-region defense.

If Washington wins, it’s an enormous Pacific Northwest raid.

If Iowa shocks everyone, it becomes one of the most unexpected elite victories of S1.

But if Bone closes Tam?

Then the No. 1 prospect in America becomes the most obvious evidence that A&M’s recruiting reach is genuinely national.

🏃 #8 NICK COTA

THE RAREST SKILL PLAYER IN THE CLASS

Nick Cota carries two different forms of scarcity.

He’s:

Florida’s only five-star.

And:

USDA’s only five-star running back.

Current battle:

Texas A&M

Miami

That’s it.

A&M is trying to walk into Florida and take the state’s only five-star.

Miami is trying to make sure Florida’s one elite headliner actually stays in Florida.

And whoever loses cannot simply pivot to another five-star RB.

There isn’t one.

That makes Cota one of the highest-leverage recruitments on the entire board.

🎯 #13 MIKE DOWNS

A&M VS. LSU FOR HALF OF LOUISIANA’S FIVE-STAR CLASS

Louisiana has two five-stars:

#5 Jaylen Pinner — WR

#13 Mike Downs — QB

LSU leads Pinner.

A&M leads Downs.

So the state’s five-star board is currently split exactly in half.

If LSU flips Downs?

The Tigers sweep Louisiana’s elite tier.

If A&M holds?

Coach Bone takes the five-star quarterback out of LSU’s backyard.

That’s not just a national recruiting win.

That’s a territorial one.

🎯 #18 DAVID REEVES

ALABAMA IS RAIDING EVERYBODY — WHILE A&M RAIDS ALABAMA

One of the great ironies of this board:

Alabama currently leads five-stars out of Georgia and Texas.

Yet the lone five-star produced by Alabama itself is currently led by Texas A&M.

David Reeves:

QB — Alabama

Board:

Texas A&M

Georgia

Alabama

That’s recruiting in a nutshell.

Nobody gets to raid without also defending.

While Alabama attempts to pull elite talent from neighboring states, Bone is standing in Alabama’s own backyard trying to leave with its five-star quarterback.

🦁 PENN STATE

BUILD THE FRONT FIRST

Penn State currently leads four:

#12 Sam Willy — EDGE — California

#19 Theo Hyde — DT — New Jersey

#27 Mitch Lovelace — EDGE — New York

#31 Sam Tonga — EDGE — New Jersey

Four five-stars.

Four defensive-front players.

Three EDGE defenders.

One DT.

Three from New York/New Jersey.

If those four eventually sign, Penn State isn’t simply adding four stars to a recruiting ranking.

It’s potentially constructing the core of an entire future defensive front in one class.

That’s arguably the strongest positional identity anywhere on the board.

🗽 NEW JERSEY

THE FIVE-STAR DEFENSIVE LINE FACTORY

New Jersey produces three five-stars.

All three play up front:

#3 Brad Zimmerman — DT

#19 Theo Hyde — DT

#31 Sam Tonga — EDGE

That’s one of the strangest and most interesting geographic concentrations in the class.

Penn State currently leads Hyde and Tonga.

Ohio State leads Zimmerman.

Notre Dame is involved with Zimmerman and Hyde.

So New Jersey has effectively become a three-player defensive-line battleground between major northern powers.

And Penn State currently controls two-thirds of it.

🌰 OHIO STATE

QUALITY AT THE VERY TOP

Ohio State leads:

#3 Brad Zimmerman

#4 Ced Gainwell

#11 AZ Igninoghene

Their average national ranking:

6.0.

That’s the best average ranking among programs currently leading multiple five-stars.

Three leaders.

Two inside the Top 4.

All three inside the Top 11.

Texas A&M has more volume.

Penn State has more volume.

But Ohio State’s current trio is concentrated extremely close to the top of the class.

🧭 THE OHIO STATE EASTERN CORRIDOR

There’s also a clear geographic identity.

Zimmerman — New Jersey.

Gainwell — Virginia.

Igninoghene — New York.

Ohio State is also involved with:

#9 Sherrod Angerer — Indiana

#27 Mitch Lovelace — New York

Every five-star on Ohio State’s board comes from Indiana or somewhere east of Ohio.

No California.

No Texas.

No Florida.

The Buckeyes have built a focused eastern board.

And right now, they’re winning some of its best players.

🔥 #3 BRAD ZIMMERMAN

THE NORTHEASTERN HEAVYWEIGHT FIGHT

Zimmerman:

DT.

New Jersey.

No. 3 nationally.

Ohio State

Penn State

Notre Dame

The stakes extend beyond one player.

Ohio State landing him gives the Buckeyes a Top-3 defensive anchor.

Penn State landing him would make its potential five-star defensive front even more absurd.

Notre Dame taking him would simultaneously deny two major northern competitors.

Some recruiting victories are worth one player.

Others are worth one player plus the loss inflicted on everybody else.

Zimmerman feels like the latter.

🔒 #4 CED GAINWELL

THREE REGIONS COLLIDE IN VIRGINIA

Gainwell’s board:

Ohio State

Alabama

Oregon

Big Ten.

SEC.

West Coast.

One of only three five-star corners.

And the No. 4 overall prospect.

There may not be a cleaner example of a truly national recruitment.

✌️ USC

CALIFORNIA FIRST

USC currently leads:

#10 Tymon Kamara — QB — California

#21 Frank Duvall — FS — California

#22 Marco Smith — ATH — California

All three are home-state prospects.

USC is also involved with:

#12 Sam Willy — EDGE — California

#17 Kane Shackelford — DT — Georgia

#23 Miguel Trapasso — DT — Texas

That’s six total five-star appearances.

Four are Californians.

So USC’s strategy is easy to see:

Build the five-star foundation at home.

Then selectively hunt outside it.

🌴 USC CURRENTLY CONTROLS 60% OF CALIFORNIA’S FIVE-STARS

California’s five:

#10 Kamara → USC

#12 Willy → Penn State

#21 Duvall → USC

#22 Smith → USC

#32 Morris → Texas

USC leads three.

And appears on a fourth.

That’s the strongest five-star home-state defense among USDA’s major talent hubs.

California currently has a gatekeeper.

And it’s USC.

🦆 THE NORTHERN THREAT

But look at who’s repeatedly attacking USC’s backyard.

Kamara includes Washington.

Willy includes Oregon.

Duvall includes Oregon.

Smith includes both Oregon and Washington.

That’s not random.

Oregon and Washington are trying to turn California into shared Western recruiting territory.

So USC’s challenge isn’t simply closing three players.

It’s maintaining a structural advantage.

If USC keeps the elite Californians home, California remains the Trojans’ greatest recruiting weapon.

If Oregon and Washington begin taking them consistently?

The entire Western balance changes.

🐘 ALABAMA

SEVEN BATTLES. THREE LEADS. ONE ACTUAL VERBAL.

Alabama appears for:

#4 Ced Gainwell — Virginia

#6 Carl Everett — Georgia

#7 Mac York — Pennsylvania

#14 Brent Lemon — Texas

#18 David Reeves — Alabama

#24 Chuck Faulk — Texas

#30 Chuck Landry — Texas

Seven five-star recruitments.

Current leaders:

Everett.

Faulk.

Landry.

And Everett is the only verbal commitment among all 32 five-stars.

Alabama’s current elite class is entirely defensive.

And its leaders come from:

Georgia.

Texas.

Texas.

The Tide are targeting America’s richest talent states rather than relying solely on home.

🤠 ALABAMA’S TEXAS SAFETY HEIST?

This deserves its own storyline.

Texas produces two five-star safeties:

#24 Chuck Faulk — FS

#30 Chuck Landry — SS

Alabama currently leads both.

Texas is second for both.

If Alabama closes them?

It could import an entire five-star safety pairing from Texas in one class.

If Texas flips them?

The Longhorns immediately transform their home-state five-star retention story.

These two recruitments are going to be worth watching together.

🔐 #6 CARL EVERETT

THE FIRST FIVE-STAR TO SAY YES

No. 6 nationally.

LB.

Georgia.

Alabama — verbal

Indiana.

Ole Miss.

Thirty-one five-stars remain uncommitted.

Everett is the exception.

So while A&M currently owns the most first-place positions, Alabama owns something nobody else does:

An actual five-star verbal.

And it came out of Georgia.

🌽 INDIANA

THE SURPRISE THAT IS STARTING TO LOOK SERIOUS

Indiana currently leads:

#7 Mac York — WR — Pennsylvania

#9 Sherrod Angerer — QB — Indiana

Average ranking:

8.0

Only Ohio State has a better average among programs leading multiple five-stars.

And Indiana’s two players fit together perfectly.

Quarterback.

Receiver.

Both Top 10.

If Indiana closes them, it could be recruiting the future centerpiece of an entire offense in one shot.

And Indiana is also listed on #6 Carl Everett’s board.

Three five-star appearances.

Two current leads.

This isn’t a giant national board.

It’s a highly efficient one.

🐯 LSU

DEFEND LOUISIANA — THEN GO HUNTING

LSU currently leads:

#5 Jaylen Pinner — WR — Louisiana

#26 Kion Willie — DT — Kansas

And appears for:

#10 Tymon Kamara — QB — California

#13 Mike Downs — QB — Louisiana

That gives LSU two very different jobs.

First:

Protect Louisiana.

Second:

Find elite talent elsewhere.

Pinner currently stays home.

Downs currently does not.

Meanwhile, LSU’s second current five-star leader isn’t from Louisiana at all.

He’s from Kansas.

🌾 #26 KION WILLIE

KANSAS BECOMES A NATIONAL BATTLEGROUND

Kion Willie:

DT.

Kansas.

Board:

LSU

Oklahoma

Texas

Georgia

That’s one of the more geographically interesting recruitments in the class.

Four major programs converging on a Kansas defensive tackle.

LSU currently leads.

If the Tigers can close Willie while keeping Pinner and eventually flipping Downs?

Then LSU’s five-star class would combine strong home-state defense with a legitimate national raid.

🤘 TEXAS

THE OPPORTUNITIES ARE THERE

Texas appears on seven five-star boards:

#2 Vernon Troyer

#7 Mac York

#14 Brent Lemon

#24 Chuck Faulk

#26 Kion Willie

#30 Chuck Landry

#32 Hugh Morris

Current leaders:

#2 Troyer

#32 Morris

So Texas does not have an access problem.

It has plenty of live opportunities.

But right now only two of those seven have the Longhorns first.

That makes Texas another program with substantial upward mobility.

🤘 #2 VERNON TROYER

THE ONE TEXAS REALLY NEEDS TO KEEP HOME

Troyer is:

No. 2 nationally.

CB.

Texas.

Board:

Texas

Oregon

BYU

He’s the highest-ranked player produced by the state.

And he’s one of only three five-star corners nationally.

Given the other elite players currently being led away from Texas, Troyer carries extra symbolic importance.

He’s not simply a Top-2 player.

He’s the current centerpiece of Texas’ elite home-state defense.

🌴 #32 HUGH MORRIS

THE LONGHORNS RAID CALIFORNIA

Texas’ other current five-star leader comes from California.

QB Hugh Morris:

Texas

Notre Dame

That’s an important counterweight to the home-state story.

Texas may be fighting outsiders in Texas.

But the Longhorns are also trying to do exactly the same thing to USC out West.

Recruiting borders work both ways.

🅾️ OKLAHOMA

DEFEND HOME. CROSS THE RED RIVER.

Oklahoma currently leads:

#16 Tyler Coffey — LB — Oklahoma

#14 Brent Lemon — LT — Texas

Coffey lists only Oklahoma.

Lemon lists:

Oklahoma.

Alabama.

Texas A&M.

Texas.

So Oklahoma’s two current five-star leaders tell two completely different stories.

One is a clean home-state defense.

The other is a heavyweight raid for the only five-star LT nationally.

That’s a very efficient two-player board.

☘️ NOTRE DAME

A NATIONAL BOARD LOOKING FOR MORE CONVERSIONS

Notre Dame appears for:

#3 Brad Zimmerman — New Jersey

#15 Lee Nwaneri — Georgia

#19 Theo Hyde — New Jersey

#21 Frank Duvall — California

#32 Hugh Morris — California

Current leader:

#15 Lee Nwaneri

The Irish are recruiting three separate regions.

Northeast.

Deep South.

West Coast.

They have access.

Now the question becomes whether Nwaneri is the first of several eventual wins.

🐶 GEORGIA

FIVE BATTLES. ZERO CURRENT LEADS.

Georgia appears for:

#15 Lee Nwaneri — Georgia

#18 David Reeves — Alabama

#26 Kion Willie — Kansas

#28 Thad Summers — Georgia

#29 Lorenzo Lockridge — North Carolina

That’s five.

Current leaders:

Zero.

And two of the five — Nwaneri and Summers — are from Georgia itself.

This does not mean Georgia is finished in those recruitments.

Quite the opposite.

It means Georgia has perhaps the largest opportunity for upward movement.

But it also means the Bulldogs enter the next phase with pressure.

Georgia produced four five-stars.

At the moment, none is led by Georgia.

That’s a storyline until Georgia changes it.

🦆 OREGON

THE MOST FASCINATING 1 ON THE BOARD

Oregon currently leads one five-star:

#20 Amani Spann — WR — Mississippi

But Oregon appears for seven:

Naz Tam.

Vernon Troyer.

Ced Gainwell.

Sam Willy.

Amani Spann.

Frank Duvall.

Marco Smith.

That’s tied for the most appearances in USDA.

So Oregon’s “one” needs context.

The Ducks aren’t absent.

They’re everywhere.

Oregon is currently fighting in:

Oregon.

Texas.

Virginia.

California.

Mississippi.

That’s massive national access.

🦆 THE OREGON PARADOX

Suppose Oregon flips Naz Tam.

Now the Ducks have the No. 1 player.

Suppose they also flip Sam Willy or Frank Duvall.

Suddenly one becomes three.

And the entire conversation changes.

That’s why Oregon may be the most volatile program on this report.

Its current leader count is small.

Its opportunity set is enormous.

The next report will tell us whether that access was the beginning of a great class — or simply a lot of battles Oregon couldn’t finish.

🦈 OLE MISS

TWO MISSISSIPPI RECEIVERS, ONE MAJOR OPPORTUNITY

Mississippi produces two five-stars.

Both are WRs:

#20 Amani Spann

#25 Josh Pili

Oregon leads Spann.

Ole Miss leads Pili.

So the state’s elite tier is split.

If Ole Miss flips Spann?

The Rebels could sweep both five-star players produced by Mississippi — and both would enter the same receiver room.

That’s an intriguing potential position-group haul.

🍊 TENNESSEE

THE REGIONAL BOARD

Tennessee appears for:

#15 Lee Nwaneri — Georgia

#17 Kane Shackelford — Georgia

#29 Lorenzo Lockridge — North Carolina

Current leader:

Lockridge

Every Tennessee five-star target comes from a neighboring state.

That’s a clear regional footprint.

And Tennessee’s Georgia presence becomes much more significant when we eventually expand into the full Blue-Chip Talent Hub Report.

The Vols aren’t just visiting Georgia for five-stars.

They’re all over the larger board.

🐅 CLEMSON

ONE APPEARANCE. ONE LEAD.

Clemson’s only five-star appearance:

#28 Thad Summers — RT — Georgia

Board:

Clemson.

Georgia.

Miami.

Clemson currently leads.

So while Clemson doesn’t have the breadth of an A&M, Alabama or Oregon, it currently has exactly what matters most:

First place for the one five-star it is pursuing on this report.

And Summers comes from neighboring Georgia.

🌴 MIAMI

ONE WIN COULD CHANGE EVERYTHING

Miami appears for:

#8 Nick Cota

#11 AZ Igninoghene

#28 Thad Summers

No current leaders.

But those three opportunities aren’t equal.

Cota is:

Florida’s only five-star.

The nation’s only five-star RB.

And currently an A&M lead.

Flip Cota and Miami’s five-star story changes immediately.

Sometimes one recruitment carries the weight of several.

🏔️ WASHINGTON

TRYING TO DISRUPT THE WEST

Washington appears for:

#1 Naz Tam — Oregon

#10 Tymon Kamara — California

#22 Marco Smith — California

#30 Chuck Landry — Texas

No current leads.

But look at the ambition.

The No. 1 player in neighboring Oregon.

Two California five-stars USC currently leads.

A Texas five-star safety.

Washington is not recruiting conservatively.

The Huskies are attempting to disrupt the Western hierarchy and selectively travel nationally.

Now they need the breakthrough.

⚔️ THE RECRUITING WARS INSIDE THE RECRUITING WAR

Certain programs keep running into each other.

That’s when individual battles start becoming rivalries.

USC vs Oregon

Sam Willy.

Frank Duvall.

Marco Smith.

Three California five-stars.

USC currently leads two of those three; Penn State leads Willy.

But Oregon is present in all three.

Texas vs Alabama

Brent Lemon.

Chuck Faulk.

Chuck Landry.

Three five-stars from Texas.

Alabama currently leads both safeties.

Oklahoma leads Lemon.

Texas is fighting in all three.

Ohio State vs Penn State

Brad Zimmerman.

Mitch Lovelace.

Two elite Northeast defenders.

Ohio State currently leads Zimmerman.

Penn State currently leads Lovelace.

Penn State vs Notre Dame

Brad Zimmerman.

Theo Hyde.

Both New Jersey DTs.

Georgia vs Tennessee

Lee Nwaneri.

Kane Shackelford.

Lorenzo Lockridge.

Three regional battles.

A&M vs LSU

Mike Downs is the direct head-to-head.

But the larger significance is A&M attempting to penetrate Louisiana while LSU tries to keep its elite quarterback home.

These aren’t isolated recruiting contests anymore.

They’re developing recruiting relationships.

And those matter because every coach has finite resources.

If the same rival forces you to defend three prospects simultaneously, that rival can affect your class without winning all three.

🔝 WHO CURRENTLY OWNS THE TOP 10?

The Top 10:

#1 Naz Tam → Texas A&M

#2 Vernon Troyer → Texas

#3 Brad Zimmerman → Ohio State

#4 Ced Gainwell → Ohio State

#5 Jaylen Pinner → LSU

#6 Carl Everett → Alabama — verbal

#7 Mac York → Indiana

#8 Nick Cota → Texas A&M

#9 Sherrod Angerer → Indiana

#10 Tymon Kamara → USC

Distribution:

Texas A&M — 2

Ohio State — 2

Indiana — 2

Texas — 1

LSU — 1

Alabama — 1

USC — 1

This is where Indiana’s story becomes especially impressive.

Penn State leads four total five-stars but none inside the Top 10.

Indiana leads only two — but both are Top 10.

Different kinds of elite classes.

📐 AVERAGE RANK OF CURRENT LEADERS

Among programs leading multiple five-stars:

Ohio State — 6.0

Indiana — 8.0

Texas A&M — 13.3

Oklahoma — 15.0

LSU — 15.5

Texas — 17.0

USC — 17.7

Alabama — 20.0

Penn State — 22.3

This is not a recruiting ranking.

Quantity matters.

Six five-stars obviously provide more total elite talent than two.

But it shows where each program’s current wins sit.

Ohio State and Indiana own exceptionally high-ranked small groups.

Penn State owns a larger group concentrated later in the five-star rankings.

A&M is the only program combining huge volume with multiple Top-10 leaders.

🏠 FIVE-STAR HOME-STATE DEFENSE

The state-by-state picture adds another layer.

CALIFORNIA — 5 FIVE-STARS

USC leads 3.

Penn State leads 1.

Texas leads 1.

USC currently controls 60% of California’s five-star tier.

TEXAS — 5

Texas leads 1.

Texas A&M leads 1.

Oklahoma leads 1.

Alabama leads 2.

Texas-based programs collectively lead 2 of 5.

GEORGIA — 4

Alabama leads 1.

Notre Dame leads 1.

Texas A&M leads 1.

Clemson leads 1.

Georgia leads 0 of 4.

LOUISIANA — 2

LSU leads 1.

Texas A&M leads 1.

MISSISSIPPI — 2

Ole Miss leads 1.

Oregon leads 1.

NEW JERSEY — 3

Ohio State leads 1.

Penn State leads 2.

The Northeast powers are dividing a uniquely defensive five-star state.

🧳 THE BIGGEST CURRENT NATIONAL RAIDS

Some current leads stand out specifically because of geography:

Texas A&M → Oregon: #1 Naz Tam

Texas A&M → Florida: #8 Nick Cota

Texas A&M → Louisiana: #13 Mike Downs

Texas A&M → Georgia: #17 Kane Shackelford

Texas A&M → Alabama: #18 David Reeves

Penn State → California: #12 Sam Willy

Ohio State → Virginia: #4 Ced Gainwell

Indiana → Pennsylvania: #7 Mac York

Notre Dame → Georgia: #15 Lee Nwaneri

Oregon → Mississippi: #20 Amani Spann

LSU → Kansas: #26 Kion Willie

Clemson → Georgia: #28 Thad Summers

Texas → California: #32 Hugh Morris

Those are the recruitments that expand a program beyond its natural footprint.

Do it once and you’ve won a national recruitment.

Do it repeatedly and you’ve built a national recruiting identity.

That’s the threshold Coach Bone and A&M are currently threatening to cross.

📈 STOCK UP

TEXAS A&M

Six leads on seven appearances.

Six different states.

Two Top-10 players.

No program currently combines volume, reach and conversion better.

OHIO STATE

Three leads.

Average ranking: 6.0.

Three Top-11 players.

Elite quality.

PENN STATE

Four five-star defensive-front leaders.

This class already has an identity.

USC

Three of California’s five five-stars currently favor the Trojans.

Home-state defense matters.

INDIANA

Two Top-10 leaders.

Potential five-star QB-WR pairing.

A small board producing enormous results.

ALABAMA

Seven appearances.

Three leads.

The only five-star verbal.

And potentially two five-star Texas safeties.

👀 PRESSURE WATCH

This is not a “stock down” declaration. It’s far too early.

These are simply programs whose current opportunities make their next moves particularly important.

OREGON

Seven appearances.

One lead.

Nobody has more room to change the perception of their five-star class quickly.

TEXAS

Seven appearances.

Two leads.

The Longhorns have plenty of opportunity but are fighting several important home-state battles.

GEORGIA

Five appearances.

Zero current leads.

Four five-stars from Georgia.

None currently led by Georgia.

The Bulldogs have enormous upside because several battles remain alive.

NOTRE DAME

Five appearances.

One lead.

A national board with multiple paths to expansion.

WASHINGTON

Four appearances.

Zero current leads.

But the Huskies are in several high-impact Western battles.

MIAMI

Three appearances.

Zero leads.

But one is Nick Cota — and one Cota victory changes the entire headline.

⭐ THE COMPLETE USDA S1 FIVE-STAR BOARD

1. Naz Tam — RT — Oregon

Texas A&M, Oregon, Washington, Iowa

The nation’s No. 1 player and the centerpiece of A&M’s national recruiting story.

2. Vernon Troyer — CB — Texas

Texas, Oregon, BYU

The highest-ranked Texas prospect and a critical home-state hold for the Longhorns.

3. Brad Zimmerman — DT — New Jersey

Ohio State, Penn State, Notre Dame

Top-3 talent sitting at the center of the Northeast defensive-line war.

4. Ced Gainwell — CB — Virginia

Ohio State, Alabama, Oregon

Three regions collide for one of the country’s three five-star corners.

5. Jaylen Pinner — WR — Louisiana

LSU

One of Louisiana’s two five-stars and currently LSU’s cleanest elite board.

6. Carl Everett — LB — Georgia

Alabama — VERBAL, Indiana, Ole Miss

The only five-star verbal commitment in USDA.

7. Mac York — WR — Pennsylvania

Indiana, Alabama, Texas

Half of Indiana’s potential Top-10 QB-WR pairing.

8. Nick Cota — RB — Florida

Texas A&M, Miami

Florida’s only five-star and the nation’s only five-star RB.

9. Sherrod Angerer — QB — Indiana

Indiana, Ohio State

The elite in-state quarterback around whom Indiana could build its future.

10. Tymon Kamara — QB — California

USC, LSU, Washington

USC’s highest-ranked current five-star leader and a major test of Western territorial control.

11. AZ Igninoghene — WR — New York

Ohio State, Miami, Iowa

The third member of Ohio State’s current Top-11 trio.

12. Sam Willy — EDGE — California

Penn State, USC, Oregon

Penn State is attempting to take a five-star pass-rusher directly out of California.

13. Mike Downs — QB — Louisiana

Texas A&M, LSU

A&M’s national reach meets LSU’s home-state defense.

14. Brent Lemon — LT — Texas

Oklahoma, Alabama, Texas A&M, Texas

The only five-star LT and one of the deepest heavyweight battles in S1.

15. Lee Nwaneri — CB — Georgia

Notre Dame, Georgia, Tennessee

A major test of whether Georgia can reclaim one of its own elite prospects.

16. Tyler Coffey — LB — Oklahoma

Oklahoma

One school listed. One of the cleanest five-star boards in the report.

17. Kane Shackelford — DT — Georgia

Texas A&M, USC, Florida State, Tennessee

Another major A&M national raid with three serious challengers.

18. David Reeves — QB — Alabama

Texas A&M, Georgia, Alabama

The only Alabama five-star currently has A&M sitting first.

19. Theo Hyde — DT — New Jersey

Penn State, Notre Dame

A key interior piece of Penn State’s potential five-star defensive front.

20. Amani Spann — WR — Mississippi

Oregon, Ole Miss

Oregon’s only current five-star leader — and one of Mississippi’s two elite receivers.

21. Frank Duvall — FS — California

USC, Notre Dame, Oregon

USC currently protects another elite California defender.

22. Marco Smith — ATH — California

USC, Oregon, Washington

The only five-star ATH and another USC-vs-Pacific-Northwest battle.

23. Miguel Trapasso — DT — Texas

Texas A&M, USC

A&M’s lone current Texas five-star leader.

24. Chuck Faulk — FS — Texas

Alabama, Texas

Half of Alabama’s potential five-star Texas safety haul.

25. Josh Pili — WR — Mississippi

Ole Miss

Ole Miss currently keeps one of Mississippi’s two five-stars home.

26. Kion Willie — DT — Kansas

LSU, Oklahoma, Texas, Georgia

Four national programs converge on Kansas for one of the country’s five elite DTs.

27. Mitch Lovelace — EDGE — New York

Penn State, Michigan, Ohio State

A perfect fit for Penn State’s developing defensive-front identity.

28. Thad Summers — RT — Georgia

Clemson, Georgia, Miami

Clemson currently leads the only five-star recruitment on which it appears.

29. Lorenzo Lockridge — QB — North Carolina

Tennessee, Georgia

Tennessee’s current five-star centerpiece.

30. Chuck Landry — SS — Texas

Alabama, Texas, Washington

The only five-star SS in the country and the second elite Texas safety currently favoring Alabama.

31. Sam Tonga — EDGE — New Jersey

Penn State

One school listed — and another potential piece of Penn State’s five-star defensive front.

32. Hugh Morris — QB — California

Texas, Notre Dame

Texas goes west and currently leads a five-star California quarterback.

🏁 THE FIRST USDA FIVE-STAR POWER MAP

Thirty-two players later, the first recruiting picture is much clearer.

Texas A&M owns the strongest current board.

Six leads.

Six states.

Seven appearances.

The No. 1 player.

The only five-star RB.

Two five-star quarterbacks.

Two five-star defensive tackles.

Coach Bone has built a board that is less about owning one pipeline and more about testing just how national A&M’s NIL recruiting reach can become.

Ohio State owns extraordinary top-end quality.

Three current leaders.

All Top 11.

Two Top 4.

Average ranking: 6.0.

Penn State owns the clearest positional identity.

Four leaders.

Three EDGE.

One DT.

An entire five-star defensive front potentially arriving from one class.

USC owns the strongest current elite home-state defense.

Three of California’s five five-stars currently point toward USC.

The Trojans remain involved with a fourth.

Indiana owns perhaps the most surprising pairing.

A Top-10 five-star QB.

A Top-10 five-star WR.

If both sign, those two recruitments could alter the trajectory of the program together.

Alabama owns the only five-star verbal.

And it could potentially pair two five-star safeties from Texas.

Oregon owns perhaps the greatest upside.

Seven five-star appearances.

Only one current lead.

That sounds disappointing until you realize how many enormous recruitments remain available to flip.

Georgia owns the most immediate pressure.

Five appearances.

No current leaders.

Four in-state five-stars.

Four current outside leaders.

Nothing is settled — but the Bulldogs have work to do.

🔮 WHAT THE NEXT FIVE-STAR REPORT WILL TELL US

This first report establishes the baseline.

The next one tells us who moved.

Did Coach Bone actually defend A&M’s enormous six-state board?

Did Naz Tam remain the symbol of A&M’s national reach — or did Oregon reclaim the country’s No. 1 player?

Did Miami save Florida’s lone five-star?

Did LSU flip Mike Downs and sweep Louisiana?

Did Penn State keep its five-star defensive front intact?

Did Ohio State close its Top-4 pair?

Did Indiana finish the dream QB-WR combination?

Did USC maintain control of California?

Did Alabama really leave Texas with two five-star safeties?

Did Texas fight back?

Did Georgia reclaim one of its four home-state five-stars?

Did Oregon finally turn seven opportunities into multiple victories?

Those are the questions now.

Because 31 of these 32 recruitments are still uncommitted.

The board hasn’t been decided.

It’s only been revealed.

And right now, one coach has placed A&M logos on more corners of that map than anyone else.

Coach Bone has Oregon.

Florida.

Louisiana.

Georgia.

Alabama.

Texas.

Whether he can keep all of them is the next story.

For now?

“HE’S GOT THE WHOLE WORLD…

…WELL, NATION…

IN HIS HANDS.”

32 FIVE-STARS. 16 STATES. 21 PROGRAMS IN THE HUNT.

THE USDA S1 FIVE-STAR WAR HAS BEGUN.

Sep 5, 2026 · 02:09 by @Swimfunk

USDA Week 1 Game of the Week

Featuring Tim

Louisville Cardinals vs. Ole Miss Rebels
Sunday Night • Nissan Stadium • Nashville

The USDA season gets an immediate heavyweight matchup as Coach Smith and the Ole Miss Rebels open the season against Louisville. The Rebels enter the game with expectations of competing for a major season, while Louisville comes in looking to make an early statement.

Ole Miss has plenty of firepower, led by quarterback Trinidad Chambliss and running back Kewan Lacy, two players expected to be central to the Rebels’ championship hopes. Chambliss’ dual-threat ability gives Louisville a difficult assignment from the opening snap.

Louisville won’t simply roll over, though. The Cardinals are coming off a 9-4 season and have the talent to make this a four-quarter fight. Their biggest challenge could be keeping pace with Ole Miss while dealing with an experienced Rebels defense.

USDA Prediction: Ole Miss survives a close opener, 34–27. If Coach Smith wants to announce that Ole Miss is ready to be a contender, this is the perfect stage.

The USDA season starts now. 🔥

Sep 4, 2026 · 21:00 by @nickd0212

USDA Conference Champions

.

Sep 4, 2026 · 17:54 by @konrad_fitzgerald

USDA: THE MAGAZINE THE FITZGERALD BLUEPRINT

Featuring Fitz

LOS ANGELES — USDA CFB27 is officially underway.

And before Coach Konrad Fitzgerald has coached his first meaningful snap back at USC, the blueprint for what he wants the Trojans to become is already beginning to emerge.

USC’s initial recruiting board features 34 prospects across eight states, including seven 5-stars and 21 players ranked inside the Top 247.

But this isn’t simply a collection of highly ranked recruits.

There’s a philosophy behind the geography.

There’s a philosophy behind the body types.

And there’s a philosophy behind where Fitzgerald intends to find them.

Build the core through high school. Keep California’s explosive talent home. Go South for more physically developed defensive athletes. Develop them. Retain them. Win with them.

USC has officially declared itself a 🏆 Recruit & Retain program.

And Fitzgerald already appears to know exactly what he wants that to look like.

🌴 KEEP CALIFORNIA HOME

The largest group on USC’s opening board comes from exactly where you’d expect:

California — 11 prospects.

For Fitzgerald, California isn’t merely USC’s recruiting territory. It’s supposed to be the source of the explosiveness that defines the Trojan offense.

Quarterbacks. Receivers. Running backs. Playmakers.

The West Coast has long produced the type of space athletes capable of making USC football look like USC football, and Fitzgerald’s strategy begins with keeping more of them home.

The goal is an offense built around speed, explosiveness and players who can change games with the ball in their hands.

And USC’s Western footprint doesn’t stop at the California border.

Nevada has four targets, while Arizona and Hawaii each contribute another.

That gives USC 17 initial targets from California, Nevada, Arizona and Hawaii.

Exactly half the board.

The West is the foundation.

But the other half tells us where Fitzgerald intends to find something different.

🐊 GO SOUTH FOR THE PROFILE

USC’s opening board includes:

Florida — 8
Texas — 7
Georgia — 1
Mississippi — 1

That’s another 17 prospects.

And Fitzgerald’s interest in the Southeast isn’t simply about recruiting rankings.

It’s about physical development.

USC wants to identify high-school defenders who already possess more of the physical profile Fitzgerald ultimately wants his defense to have — bigger frames, length, explosiveness and developed athletic bodies that potentially require less projection once they arrive on campus.

The vision is essentially to build an SEC-style athletic defense in Los Angeles.

That doesn’t mean simply recruiting bigger players.

It means finding the combination.

Defensive linemen with mass who can move.

Edges with length and acceleration.

Linebackers who can run without being undersized.

Safeties with legitimate frames and coverage athleticism.

Corners with length, speed and physicality.

Fitzgerald isn’t interested in choosing between size and athleticism.

He wants both.

And the Southeast and Texas will be major hunting grounds for finding it.

🧬 BODY TYPE OVER ZIP CODE

That’s an important distinction in understanding USC’s strategy.

This isn’t Fitzgerald declaring that California produces offensive players and the South produces defensive players.

USC will recruit elite players anywhere.

What we’re seeing instead is a trait-based approach to geography.

California naturally gives USC access to one of America’s premier collections of offensive skill talent.

Meanwhile, Fitzgerald is deliberately expanding USC’s defensive search into regions where he believes he can find more high-school players who already possess the size, length and athletic development he’s looking for.

If that player is in Southern California?

Keep him home.

If he’s in Miami?

Go get him.

If he’s in Dallas, Atlanta or Mississippi?

USC intends to be there.

The objective isn’t to recruit a map.

It’s to recruit a profile.

🏆 RECRUIT. DEVELOP. RETAIN.

USC’s choice of Recruit & Retain may ultimately tell us even more than the opening board itself.

Fitzgerald has committed USC to a philosophy that places 70% of its Talent Acquisition resources toward high-school recruiting and 30% toward the Transfer Portal.

And this isn’t a one-year experiment.

Under USDA rules, Fitzgerald is locked into that program-building identity for the next three seasons.

That means USC isn’t planning to live offseason-to-offseason hoping the portal fixes its roster.

The expectation is that the majority of future Trojan starters will be players USC recruited itself.

Sign them at 18.

Develop them.

Get them onto the field.

Retain them when they become stars.

Then use the portal strategically to finish the roster.

That’s the model.

🛡️ THE LB & SAFETY EXCEPTION

There is one particularly interesting wrinkle in Fitzgerald’s roster construction.

Linebacker and safety are two positions USC expects to attack aggressively through the Transfer Portal.

That’s intentional.

Fitzgerald’s defensive structure puts a premium on those positions. With two linebackers and three safeties regularly on the field, USC needs five second-level defenders who can handle significant responsibility.

And those are positions where Fitzgerald sees value in acquiring players who have already spent time developing at the college level.

But even here, the opening recruiting strategy matters.

The portal preference at LB and safety doesn’t mean USC will stop recruiting those positions from high school.

Instead, Fitzgerald can be more selective.

If USC finds a high-school linebacker in Florida with the size, movement skills and developed frame they’re looking for, that’s exactly the kind of player worth developing internally.

Same with a long, athletic safety from Texas or Georgia.

The Southeast strategy gives USC an opportunity to find younger versions of the same physical profiles Fitzgerald would otherwise be hunting in the portal.

If those evaluations hit?

Over time, USC may need the portal less.

That’s exactly what Recruit & Retain is supposed to accomplish.

⭐ USC IS AIMING HIGH

Fitzgerald isn’t easing into his first recruiting cycle.

The initial 34-player board includes:

⭐ 5-Star — 7

🔥 Top 100 — 6

📈 Top 247 — 8

4-Star — 6

3-Star — 8

Altogether, 21 of the 34 targets — nearly 62% — are Top-247 caliber or better.

That’s an aggressive opening board.

There are developmental prospects included, but USC clearly intends to compete at the top of the market immediately.

And under Recruit & Retain, those evaluations become especially important.

Every high-school player isn’t simply a recruiting win.

He’s potentially part of a three- or four-year investment.

🗺️ THE BOARD TELLS THE STORY

Perhaps nothing captures Fitzgerald’s vision better than the symmetry of USC’s initial recruiting map.

WEST — 17

California — 11
Nevada — 4
Arizona — 1
Hawaii — 1

SOUTH — 17

Florida — 8
Texas — 7
Georgia — 1
Mississippi — 1

17 and 17.

One half of the board is built around protecting USC’s natural recruiting territory.

The other half reaches directly into the regions producing many of the physical profiles Fitzgerald wants to add.

It’s almost a perfect representation of what USC is trying to create.

✌️ A CALIFORNIA OFFENSE THAT DEFENDS LIKE AN SEC TEAM

Fitzgerald already knows what championship football at USC looks like.

Now, returning to the program where he previously won two national championships, he’s trying to build his next version of it.

And this one has a very specific DNA.

California supplies the electricity.

The West supplies the foundation.

The Southeast supplies another level of size, length and defensive athleticism.

The portal selectively supplements LB, safety and immediate needs.

High-school recruiting builds the roster.

Retention keeps it together.

That’s why USC’s first recruiting board matters.

The Trojans aren’t simply chasing stars.

They’re attempting to build a roster where eventually you can look at a player before seeing his rating and think:

Yeah. That’s a Fitzgerald USC guy.

34 targets.
8 states.
7 five-stars.
21 Top-247-or-better prospects.
17 from the West.
17 from the South.

The first recruiting cycle of USDA CFB27 has begun.

And USC has already made its intentions clear:

KEEP THE SPEED HOME.

BRING THE SEC ATHLETES WEST.

RECRUIT THEM. DEVELOP THEM. RETAIN THEM.

FIGHT ON.

Sep 3, 2026 · 08:27 by @Swimfunk

USDA The Magazine. Volume 3

Featuring J-Gold Avina Trent

THREE STARS. ONE GOAL.

As USDA Season 1 begins, three players stand above the rest: Ohio State superstar Jeremiah Smith, Oregon quarterback Dante Moore, and Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss. Each has the opportunity to become the face of his program while chasing college football’s biggest prizes—the Heisman Trophy, a national championship, and eventually a high position in the NFL Draft.

Jeremiah Smith is one of the most explosive players in college football. The Ohio State receiver has the size, speed, and game-changing ability to take over any matchup. While winning the Heisman as a receiver is difficult, a dominant season combined with a Buckeye championship run could make Smith impossible for voters to ignore. His NFL future is already incredibly bright, but first he has the chance to build an unforgettable legacy at Ohio State.

Dante Moore enters the season with enormous expectations at Oregon. The talented quarterback has the arm, leadership, and supporting cast necessary to lead the Ducks deep into the national championship race. A huge season could elevate Moore into one of college football’s top quarterback prospects while placing him firmly in the Heisman conversation.

Trinidad Chambliss brings excitement every time he steps onto the field. The Ole Miss quarterback’s ability to make plays and take over games gives the Rebels a legitimate championship weapon. If Chambliss can lead Ole Miss through a tough season and into the playoff, his Heisman and NFL Draft stock could rise dramatically.

Three stars. Three powerhouse programs. One ultimate goal. When USDA Season 1 is over, Jeremiah Smith, Dante Moore, or Trinidad Chambliss could be holding college football’s biggest trophy.

Sep 3, 2026 · 00:01 by @Swimfunk

South Carolina Welcomes Coach Johnson

Featuring Swim

A New Era in Columbia: Coach Scott Johnson Takes the Helm

The Scott Johnson era is officially underway at South Carolina, with one clear mission: build the Gamecocks into an SEC powerhouse. The Athletic Director has already set important goals, including beating Clemson, producing at least two All-Conference players, and committing to disciplined football with 15 or fewer offensive turnovers.

Johnson knows success won’t happen overnight in the difficult SEC. “This is going to take patience,” Johnson said. “You build a championship program through recruiting, player development, discipline, and competing every single week.”

The new coach has made his long-term vision clear. “We want South Carolina to become a program nobody wants to face,” Johnson said. “The SEC is the toughest conference in college football, and we’re going to work every day to make the Gamecocks a championship contender.”

The expectations are high, but Coach Johnson is ready for the challenge. A new era has officially begun in Columbia.

Aug 16, 2026 · 14:31 by @nickd0212

FSU!

.

Aug 11, 2026 · 13:06 by @Swimfunk

FSU Has Everything… Except a Leader

The Florida State Seminoles are one of the most intriguing situations in the USDA League right now. A historic program competing in the ACC, FSU has the recruiting territory, talent and national reputation to be a championship contender. But there’s one major problem in Tallahassee: the Seminoles currently don’t have a leader.

That makes this job one of the most attractive openings in the league. Florida State has everything a coach could want — a strong recruiting base, a proud history and the opportunity to dominate the ACC. This isn’t a rebuild. The pieces are already there. Someone just needs to step in and put it all together.

The biggest question is who can handle the pressure. FSU needs more than a coach; they need someone willing to make the program their own, establish an identity and bring confidence back to the Seminoles. Without that leadership, all the talent in the world won’t matter.

Rumor has it three coaches are already interested in the job. Now the USDA League waits to see who is willing to take the reins. Florida State has the tradition, the talent and the stage. All they’re missing is the person to lead them.

Aug 6, 2026 · 12:44 by @Swimfunk

Lee Corso Picks OSU for Season 1

Featuring Trent

Corso’s Championship Call: Why Coach Trent and Ohio State Are Destined for USDA Glory

When Lee Corso reached for the Ohio State mascot head on the USDA Sports Network set, it wasn’t just another famous GameDay prediction—it was a statement. With a grin, Corso declared that Coach Trent and the Buckeyes would capture the USDA Season 1 National Championship. While the pick surprised some of the panel, Corso explained that championship teams are built on proven leadership, and few coaches in the league have a résumé as impressive as Trent’s. “Big games don’t scare him,” Corso said. “He’s been there before, and he knows how to finish.”

Much of that confidence stems from Trent’s remarkable run at Georgia. During his time in Athens, he transformed the Bulldogs into one of the league’s premier programs, consistently competing for conference titles while building a reputation for physical football and disciplined execution. His teams rarely beat themselves, thriving in pressure situations and making timely adjustments that often turned close contests into victories. That championship pedigree now follows him to Columbus, where expectations are just as high.

Ohio State also provides Trent with one of the most complete rosters in USDA Season 1. The Buckeyes boast elite team speed, explosive playmakers on offense, and a defense loaded with athletes capable of changing a game with one turnover or one big stop. Combined with one of the deepest recruiting pipelines in college football, the roster has the talent to compete with anyone in the country. Corso believes that Trent’s ability to maximize those strengths gives Ohio State an edge over every other contender.

The road to a championship will undoubtedly feature powerhouse opponents and difficult road environments, but Corso believes those challenges only strengthen Ohio State’s case. With an experienced coach, a championship culture, and a roster built for the biggest moments, the Buckeyes enter USDA Season 1 as the team to beat. If Corso’s prediction proves accurate, fans may look back at the famous mascot-head moment as the day the championship race officially began—and the day Coach Trent’s Buckeyes announced they were ready to rule college football once again.

Aug 2, 2026 · 13:13 by @nickd0212

Top 25

Top 25

Jul 29, 2026 · 11:41 by @Swimfunk

USDA - Why Not Me?

Featuring KJ

Why Sam Leavitt Can Win the Heisman

When LSU landed quarterback Sam Leavitt, the talent was never in question. The real story is who will be guiding him. In USDA, few owners have built a stronger reputation than KJB, whose offenses have consistently been among the league’s most explosive. Year after year, he’s put his quarterbacks in position to succeed, making LSU one of the most dangerous programs in the country.

KJB understands what it takes to develop a Heisman-caliber quarterback. His aggressive offensive philosophy creates big-play opportunities and eye-popping statistics, exactly what voters look for. More importantly, his teams win games, and Heisman campaigns are built on signature victories as much as individual numbers. Sam Leavitt enters the season in the perfect environment to showcase his talent every Saturday.

If Leavitt can stay healthy and capitalize on KJB’s system, the numbers should take care of themselves. With LSU expected to compete for the SEC title and the College Football Playoff, every big performance will strengthen his Heisman résumé. The talent is undeniable, but paired with one of USDA’s premier offensive minds, Sam Leavitt has everything he needs to make a serious run at college football’s most prestigious individual award.

Jul 27, 2026 · 21:05 by @Jbone15

BONES USDA TOP 3 CONFERENCE PREDICTIONS

Top 3 Teams in Every Power Conference Entering CFB27

The road to a USDA National Championship starts with winning your conference. With new coaches, familiar faces, and powerhouse rosters across the country, these are the teams expected to lead the way when CFB27 kicks off.

🏆 SEC

1. LSU Tigers — Coach KJ

No coach enters CFB27 with more respect than Coach KJ. A nine-time National Champion, KJ has built a reputation for showing up when the lights shine the brightest. Every season opponents circle LSU on the schedule because they know beating KJ usually means surviving one of the toughest game plans in USDA. The question isn't whether LSU has talent—it's whether anyone can finally slow down a dynasty.

If KJ gets his offense rolling early and continues making clutch decisions in big moments, LSU is once again the favorite to win the SEC and compete for another national title.

Players to Watch
QB Sam Leavitt
RB Harlem Berry
WR Jackson Harris

2. Texas Longhorns — Coach Raine

Coach Raine has never lacked explosive offense, but CFB27 could be the year he proves he can win in multiple ways. Defenses already fear his passing attack, but if he establishes a consistent rushing game to complement it, Texas could become one of the most complete teams in the country.

The Longhorns possess elite talent on both sides of the ball, and if Raine finds the right balance between patience and aggression, they'll challenge LSU for conference supremacy.

Players to Watch
QB Arch Manning
RB Raleek Brown
EDGE Colin Simmons

3. Georgia Bulldogs — Coach Pud

Coach Pud begins a new chapter with Georgia, but success will depend on discipline. Everyone knows he loves throwing the football, but Georgia's roster is built to dominate the trenches and punish defenses with a physical rushing attack. If Pud resists turning the Bulldogs into an Air Raid offense and instead leans into their strengths, Georgia could make a deep playoff run.

The Bulldogs have championship talent—it all comes down to whether the scheme matches the roster.

Players to Watch
QB Gunner Stockton
HB Nate Frazier
FS KJ Bolden

🏆 BIG TEN

1. Oregon Ducks — Coach Avina

Nobody questions Coach Avina's stick skills. He's one of the best gamers in USDA. The next step is mastering the X's and O's at an even higher level. If he combines elite user ability with smarter game management and situational football, Oregon could become the team nobody wants to face on Saturdays.

With explosive athletes all over the field, the Ducks have the firepower to win the Big Ten and compete for the national championship.

Players to Watch
QB Dante Moore
SS Koi Perich
WR Dakorien Moore

2. Ohio State Buckeyes — Coach Trent

Coach Trent was arguably the most improved coach in CFB26, and now expectations are much higher. Ohio State has one of the deepest rosters in USDA, and if Trent continues putting in work both on and off the field, the Buckeyes should be competing for the Big Ten Championship every single season.

With elite talent at quarterback, running back, and wide receiver, Ohio State has all the tools needed for a title run.

Players to Watch
WR Jeremiah Smith
QB Julian Sayin
HB Bo Jackson

3. USC Trojans — Coach Fitz

Coach Fitz might have the highest football IQ in USDA. Few coaches can create game plans capable of beating anyone on any given week. The only thing that occasionally hurts him is overthinking situations. Back with his favorite team, Fitz believes football knowledge beats pure video game skill, and he'll have every opportunity to prove it.

If USC avoids costly mistakes and executes consistently, they'll be a dangerous contender in the Big Ten.

Players to Watch
QB Jayden Maiava
CB Jontez Williams
HB Waymond

🏆 ACC

1. Miami Hurricanes — Coach Classic

Coach Classic has long been considered one of the USDA greats, but his biggest challenge has always been staying committed to the run game. Miami has the athletes to bully opponents, and if Classic builds his offense around establishing the ground attack before opening up the passing game, the Hurricanes could dominate the ACC from start to finish.

This roster has championship potential if the offense stays balanced.

Players to Watch
QB Darian Mensah
HB Mark Fletcher Jr.
WR Malachi Toney

2. Clemson Tigers — Coach Dimez

Coach Dimez finally gets to lead his favorite team, and expectations couldn't be higher. Clemson has explosive playmakers everywhere, but success will depend on offensive patience. Instead of searching for the home-run throw every drive, Dimez must be willing to take what defenses give him. If he does, Clemson has enough talent to challenge anyone in USDA.

The Tigers are built to contend for both the ACC title and a College Football Playoff berth.

Players to Watch
MLB Sammy Brown
WR TJ Moore
WR Bryant Wesco Jr.

3. SMU Mustangs — Coach Raz

Coach Raz has already proven he doesn't need a blue-blood program to win football games. No matter what roster he's given, he consistently finds ways to compete. SMU may not receive the same national attention as some of the bigger brands, but they have enough speed and offensive weapons to surprise everyone in the ACC.

If Raz continues maximizing his talent and winning the turnover battle, don't be surprised if SMU crashes the conference championship race.

Players to Watch
QB Kevin Jennings
HB Kendrick Raphael
WR Yamir Knight

🔥 Final Prediction

SEC Favorite: 🥇 LSU

Big Ten Favorite: 🥇 Oregon

ACC Favorite: 🥇 Miami

Three conferences. Nine contenders. One National Championship.

The biggest question entering USDA CFB27: Which coach will live up to the preseason hype, and which one will crumble once conference play begins?

Jul 23, 2026 · 15:48 by @Swimfunk

USDA - The U is Back

Featuring Classic

Introducing USDA the magazine. Here we will be going over some of the major stories throughout USDA. Volume 1 is none other than “The U is Back”. This cover story is perfect since they went #1 in the USDA draft.

USDA Vol. 1: The U is Back

The U Is Back: Classic Bets on Miami With the No. 1 Pick

When the USDA draft clock hit zero, there was no more speculation. Owner Classic officially selected Miami with the first overall pick, signaling that one of college football’s most iconic brands is ready to return to the top. After days of rumors connecting him to powerhouse programs across the country, Classic made the bold choice to rebuild the swagger that once made the Hurricanes the most feared team in America. The message was clear: The U is back.

Few programs can match Miami’s legendary history. From producing Hall of Famers and first-round NFL Draft picks to winning national championships with an unmatched level of confidence, the Hurricanes built a dynasty that changed college football forever. Their intimidating style, elite speed, and championship pedigree made them the standard by which other programs measured themselves. Now, under Classic’s leadership in the USDA, Miami has an opportunity to write the next chapter in that storied legacy.

The road back to national prominence begins in the ACC, and Miami has every reason to believe it can reclaim control of the conference. With explosive athletes on both sides of the ball, a roster built around speed, and a recruiting brand that still carries national recognition, the Hurricanes have the tools to dominate the league. If Classic can capitalize on favorable conference matchups while developing his roster throughout the season, Miami could quickly separate itself as the ACC’s premier program and secure a spot in the College Football Playoff.

Perhaps the biggest reason for excitement is Miami’s NFL-caliber talent. The Hurricanes continue to attract explosive playmakers capable of changing games with a single snap, giving Classic one of the highest ceilings in the USDA. If he can blend disciplined coaching with Miami’s trademark swagger, there is every reason to believe this team can compete for a national championship. The expectations are enormous, but so is the opportunity. Classic didn’t just make the first pick in the draft—he made a statement that college football’s sleeping giant is awake once again, and the rest of the USDA has officially been put on notice.

Jul 17, 2026 · 09:20 by @Swimfunk

Why Coach Funk is the Right Man for the Gamecocks

Featuring Swim

When the University of South Carolina announced Coach Funk as their new head football coach, it signaled a bold new direction for Columbia. He arrives not as an untested coordinator, but as a seasoned leader who has been thoroughly battle-tested by the unforgiving realities of the SEC.

Lessons from the Georgia Grind

Funk’s tenure at the University of Georgia wasn't a walk in the park. Facing intense scrutiny, high-pressure expectations, and offensive slumps that drew the ire of a demanding fanbase, he weathered a storm that would have broken lesser coaches. But those grueling struggles in Athens are exactly what make him the right fit for the Gamecocks. He isn't just familiar with the SEC; he is hardened by it, arriving in Columbia with a chip on his shoulder and the invaluable resilience that only comes from surviving the conference's toughest trials.
“I am excited to be here and look forward to getting to work,” Coach Funk said upon arriving.

Navigating the SEC Gauntlet

With his firsthand experience of how quickly things can go sideways in this conference, Funk is under no illusions about the road ahead. He is ready to channel those hard-learned lessons into a gritty, realistic rebuilding effort.
“We have our work cut out for us in the tough SEC conference but I feel we will shock some people,” he noted.

Developing the Future

A key focus of Funk's redemption tour is unlocking the roster's high-ceiling talent, starting with sophomore quarterback LaNorris Sellars.
“I look forward to putting my working with LaNorris Sellars and making him the best he can be.”

With the scars of the SEC to guide him and an energized community behind him, Coach Funk is ready to turn his past struggles into South Carolina's future triumphs.

Jul 16, 2026 · 10:03 by @CTROB

Happy Birthday Nug, and to Celebrate..

To Celebrate the birthday of the illest member of #SecondLine we have a special announcement....

The wait is over. The Selection Show premieres tonight at 7:00 PM EST — the full two-man booth broadcast revealing every coach's landing spot, one pick at a time, all the way to the #1 finale.

▶ Watch it right here — no leaving the app. We just shipped inline video: the reveal plays directly on LegacyCFB — on the reveal page and right on the home marquee. Hit play and watch the whole show without ever clicking out to YouTube. Same broadcast, zero bouncing around.

📺 And it's coming to LegacyCFB TV, too. That same inline-player upgrade is rolling out to LegacyCFB TV — so member streams will play inside the app instead of kicking you over to YouTube or Twitch. The broadcast comes to you.

Set your reminder. Grab your seat. 7:00 PM EST tonight — let's find out where everybody landed. 🎙️🔥

Jul 15, 2026 · 17:45 by @nickd0212

USDA Selection Show!

LegacyCFB Selection Show: Breaking Down the Numbers Before the Reveal

With the LegacyCFB Selection Show set to unveil its final rankings on Friday, the numbers behind the process already tell a fascinating story. Thirty coaches submitted thirty boards, creating one of the most competitive selection cycles in recent memory. From powerhouse conferences to surprise contenders, there was little agreement about who deserves the top spot in CFB 27.

Conference Dominance

The SEC once again proved why it remains college football’s deepest conference, placing 14 programs on the final collection of boards. The Big Ten followed closely with 10 selections, while the ACC and independent programs combined for six appearances.

The distribution highlights the growing divide between the nation’s top conferences and the rest of the field. Together, the SEC and Big Ten accounted for 24 of the 30 selected teams, reinforcing their status as the sport’s premier leagues.

Alabama Leads the Field

No team appeared on more boards than Alabama, earning a place on 21 of the 30 ballots. While the Crimson Tide may not have secured the most first-place votes, their consistency across the selection committee made them one of the safest picks in the field.

Texas, meanwhile, posted the strongest average draft position. Appearing on 16 different lists, the Longhorns held an impressive average ranking of 5.06, suggesting that voters viewed them as one of the nation’s elite programs.

LSU Emerges as the Favorite

Although there was no unanimous choice for the top team, LSU entered the reveal as the closest thing to a consensus favorite. The Tigers earned four first-place votes—the most of any program—and topped four different boards.

Their performance reflects the challenge facing selectors this year: several programs possess championship-level talent, making it difficult to separate the contenders from one another.

No Clear Number One

Perhaps the most surprising statistic is the lack of agreement among voters. Eighteen different programs received at least one first-place vote, an unprecedented level of parity that underscores how competitive this year’s landscape has become.

Unlike previous seasons, there is no dominant favorite heading into the reveal. Every coach and voter brought a different perspective, resulting in a selection process filled with debate and uncertainty.

By the Numbers

* 30 coaches submitted ballots.
* 30 programs made the final boards.
* 456 total picks were cast.
* 51 different programs received votes.
* Teams appeared on an average of 15 boards.
* Alabama appeared on the most ballots (21).
* Texas posted the highest average draft slot (5.06).
* LSU earned the most first-place votes (4).
* Michigan and Oregon appeared on 20 and 18 boards, respectively.

Friday’s Reveal

The numbers suggest that this year’s LegacyCFB Selection Show will be one of the most unpredictable yet. With no consensus number one and dozens of programs receiving recognition, Friday’s reveal promises drama, debate, and plenty of surprises as the final board is unveiled.

Jul 15, 2026 · 13:29 by @Jbone15

Pud with a HEAVY HEART!

Featuring Pud

LegacyCFB Wire | USDA Feature
A Heavy Heart: Will Pud Finally Leave Miami Behind?

For years, one thing in USDA has been automatic: Pud was going to be Miami.
The Hurricanes weren't just his favorite team—they became part of his identity. Season after season, Pud proudly wore the orange and green, dominating the ACC, posting an impressive .800 winning percentage, and punching his ticket to the College Football Playoff on a regular basis.
But for the first time in CFB27... that tradition may be over.

The draft board isn't falling in his favor, and there's a real possibility someone else calls Miami's name before Pud gets the chance. If that happens, one of USDA's most loyal coaches will be forced to make the toughest decision of his dynasty career.

A New Chapter?
Instead of another run with the Hurricanes, Pudd's attention has shifted toward three powerhouse programs:
🟠 Texas Longhorns
🔴 Georgia Bulldogs
🟢 Oregon Ducks
Each offers championship-caliber talent, elite recruiting, and a chance to compete for a national title.
But there's one major difference...
Unlike Miami and the ACC, these programs would throw Pudd into the fire every single week.

Can He Survive the SEC or Big Ten?
Critics have always pointed to one thing.
"Pudd wins a lot... but he's always been in the ACC."
It's hard to argue with the results. The playoffs have become almost routine, but the road through the ACC isn't viewed the same as surviving the weekly gauntlet of the SEC or the Big Ten.

Can Pud maintain that .800 level against Georgia, Texas, Alabama, LSU, Ohio State, Penn State, Oregon, Michigan, and the rest of college football's heavyweights?
Or will life outside the ACC prove to be too much?

The Ultimate Question
A change of scenery could be exactly what Pud needs.
Texas offers elite facilities and endless recruiting opportunities.
Georgia is arguably the most complete program in the country with unmatched pipelines.
Oregon provides speed, innovation, and West Coast recruiting power.
Any of the three could finally deliver the one thing missing from Pud's résumé...
🏆 His first USDA National Championship.

Prediction
This isn't just about changing teams.
It's about changing legacies.
If Pud wins a title with Texas, Georgia, or Oregon, no one will ever be able to say he only succeeded because he stayed in the ACC.
But if he can't let go of Miami—and if the heartbreak of losing the Hurricanes lingers—it could become the biggest obstacle of his CFB27 season.

One thing is certain:
The next time Pud takes the field, he may not be wearing orange and green... and the entire USDA will be watching to see whether a new logo can finally bring him the national championship he's been chasing.

Jul 15, 2026 · 12:38 by @Swimfunk

The Classic Dilemma

Featuring Classic

With the USDA team draft finally upon us, there’s one question everyone keeps asking: Who in the world is Classic taking with the No. 1 overall pick? The bad news is nobody knows—not even Classic. League insiders report that his “final decision” has changed approximately 47 times over the past week. One day he’s all in on Texas because “the recruiting is unmatched.” The next morning he’s convinced Notre Dame is the move. By lunch he’s tweeting about Miami, by dinner he’s studying Ohio State, and before bed he’s somehow back to Alabama… unless Georgia wins him over after watching one hype video.

At this point, Classic isn’t drafting a football team—he’s speed dating blue bloods. Every conversation starts with, “I’ve finally decided…” and ends with six different schools still “under serious consideration.” League members have reportedly stopped asking who he’s picking because the answer expires faster than milk left in the sun. If indecisiveness were a player rating, Classic would be the first-ever 99 Overall.

The rest of the league has embraced the chaos. Mock drafts have become completely useless because Classic changes his mind before the ink dries. Some owners are hoping he takes Texas. Others are praying for Georgia or Alabama. A few believe Miami is the dark horse. The only thing everyone agrees on is that he’ll somehow convince himself Ohio State is the obvious choice for about 20 minutes before discovering another YouTube dynasty video that sends him in a completely different direction.

Draft night can’t come soon enough. Whether it’s Texas, Notre Dame, Miami, Ohio State, Alabama, or Georgia, USDA fans are ready for the mystery to end. Until then, Classic remains the undisputed offseason champion of overthinking. The only lock in this entire draft is that he’ll probably announce he’s “100% decided”… right before changing his mind one last time.

Jul 11, 2026 · 20:58 by @CTROB

CFB 27 S1: Draft Boards Closing In

Four days out from the start of CFB 27 Season 1, and the virtual stadiums are buzzing! The clock is ticking, and our coaches are making their final moves before lock-in. We've got a slate of locked-in contenders ready to roll: Nickyd0212, BiG_AIThe3rd, Asagikoii, CTROB, Puddin2010, Agent00Dimez, Boobysmoove3, jmaj315, Jojodancer1, and pdupree12 are all set. They've done the work, and now it's just a waiting game for the show to begin!

But hold up! Some coaches have their boards full but forgot that crucial 'Lock In' button. RIP_KOBE_824, MeRcY_SwisHy, youngfitz06, ochowho, Razdagawd720, nolimitslap, METROOO28, Oliipurp, and Illvibe_ – you're so close! Don't let your hard work go to waste; hit that lock button and secure your spot.

Others are still building their dream rosters. Smitty_8_, BYU_NEW843 (just one away!), RoyalxSwipa, dabigbird-, bigcudycud, and Da24Truth (two away!) are finishing strong.

For those who haven't even started, like Coach_Avina, Jgold901, and Swimfunk, the system will make the picks for you if you don't lock in. Remember, this is a blind draft – fill every slot to avoid getting left with the scraps!

Jul 11, 2026 · 10:39 by @CTROB

NCAA 26 S13: Lock Your Boards Before July 15!

The clock is ticking, coaches! With the USDA CFB 27 season near, the boards are filling up fast, but there's still work to be done before the July 15 deadline.

Eight boards are already locked and loaded, and another twelve are just a click away from being fully ranked and ready to go. That means only ten coaches are still on the outside looking in, needing to finalize their selections.

Don't get caught by the Power Index! If your light isn't green by Tuesday, July 15, your program's fate will be left to chance. Remember, the Selection Show can't kick off until every single board is greenlit. The teams you rank are the teams you can land – make sure your voice is heard and your program isn't left to an auto-select!

It's simple to lock in your board: head to 'My Board' under Selection, rank your teams up to your pick # of teams in the order you desire, and hit Save.

When your board is full, that gold 'Ready to lock in' beacon will light up. Hit it, and your beacon turns GREEN!

That's your ticket to the show. Don't delay – get that green light and let's get the board set for an epic Selection Show on July 17!

Jun 19, 2026 · 19:06 by @CTROB

NCAA 26 S13: Ducks Upset Nittany Lions, Legacy Points Race Heats Up!

Well folks, Week 18 of NCAA 26 S13 was a wild one, with the Oregon Ducks coached by Raine pulling off the biggest shocker of the season, knocking off #2 PSU coached by Fitz with a 27-21 victory. Meanwhile, #5 CLEM coached by Avina couldn't quite get it done against Rob's #12 ALA, falling 24-20 in a defensive struggle.

The Legacy Points leaderboard is looking spicy! RIP_KOBE_824's TEX remains at the top with a whopping 245.97 points. KJB051's MISS is right on their heels, and BiG_AlThe3rd's OSU, Asagikoii's UGA, and MeRcY_SwisHy's WIS are all jockeying for position. It's anyone's game as we head into Week 19!

This week's slate features a massive matchup as Raine's #11 Oregon Ducks face Rob's #12 Alabama Crimson Tide in the Natty. Can the Ducks keep their momentum going after that huge upset, or will the Tide silence the doubters at home? You won't want to miss this one!

Jun 18, 2026 · 13:20 by @CTROB

NCAA 26 S13: Week 18 Digest - Upsets, Legacy Points & More!

Well folks, Week 17 of NCAA 26 S13 served up some absolute barnburners! The biggest shockwave came from Tuscaloosa, where Rob's ALA squad, ranked #12, stunned the undefeated #1 UGA with a nail-biting 52-50 victory. Trent's Bulldogs fought valiantly, but it wasn't enough to overcome ALA's offensive firepower. Meanwhile, #2 PSU put on a clinic against #6 WIS, taking them down 28-17, and #5 CLEM edged out #4 TENN 33-30 in a thriller. Not to be outdone, #11 ORE handed #3 MIA a 32-17 defeat, and #17 MICH stomped USU 57-10.

Speaking of ALA's stunning upset, Rob's crew is making some serious noise! As for the Legacy Points race, the top spot is still fiercely contested. TEX holds onto #1 with 245.97 LP, but MISS is right on their heels at #2 with 245.1. OSU, UGA, and WIS round out the top 5, proving that consistent performance and big plays are key to climbing the LP ranks.

This week, get ready for another heavyweight clash as #5 Avina's CLEM heads to Tuscaloosa to face Rob's #12 ALA. Can ALA pull off another upset? Also, #2 PSU will try to keep their momentum going on the road against #11 ORE. It's shaping up to be another wild weekend in the league!

Jun 6, 2026 · 10:16 by @CTROB

NCAA 26 S13: Week 8 Recap & Week 9 Hype!

Welcome back, college football fanatics, to your NCAA 26 S13 weekly digest! Week 7 was an absolute barn-burner, and we saw some incredible action across the league. The biggest shocker of the week came from Lubbock, where TTU pulled off a stunning upset, taking down the #13 ranked ASU Sun Devils 42-35! What a statement win for TTU! Elsewhere, Miami absolutely dominated Van, with a commanding 58-6 victory. We also saw FSU secure a Game of the Week win over PITT, 38-13. The Legacy Points race is heating up! Mississippi leads the pack with a staggering 240.7 LP, followed closely by Texas at 234.97 and Ohio State at 231.51. Get ready, because Week 8 is already shaping up to be epic! We've got ranked matchups galore, including #8 Oregon heading to #25 Washington, and #12 Alabama visiting #11 Arkansas! Plus, don't miss #17 Michigan facing off against USC, and #13 LSU battling #10 Mississippi. This is what college football is all about!

Jun 5, 2026 · 21:06 by @CTROB

NCAA 26 S13 Power Rankings: Unbeatens Reign Supreme!

Welcome back to the NCAA 26 S13 hype desk! The season is heating up and the undefeated titans are holding strong. At the top, the ORE Ducks, led by Boobysmoove3, are flying high at a perfect 6-0!

They're not alone in their flawless campaign, as UGA, with Asagikoii at the helm, also boasts a 6-0 record and sits comfortably at number two. The Seminoles of FSU, powered by Agent00Dimez, are right on their heels at 5-0, proving they are a force to be reckoned with.

Pensylvania State, with youngfitz06 orchestrating their attack, remains perfect at 4-0, showing incredible grit. Mississippi, under KJB051, is also undefeated at 5-0, making a serious statement. Ohio State, with BiG_AlThe3rd, continues its perfect 4-0 start, while Miami-OH, guided by Razdagawd720, is the only other team with a 6-0 record in the top ten!

But don't count out the one-loss squads! Miami, led by Puddin2010, and Indiana, with jmaj315, are both 5-1 and hungry to climb. Even Alabama, with CTROB, at 5-1, is looking to make noise. The playoff picture is still wide open, folks!

Jun 5, 2026 · 21:03 by @CTROB

NCAA 26 S13 Week 7: Unranked Powerhouses and Legacy Leaders!

Welcome back, college football fanatics, to your weekly dose of NCAA 26 S13 action! Week 6 delivered fireworks across the league, with some incredible upsets and dominant performances. The biggest shocker came out of Oxford, where MISS went on the road and absolutely dismantled Notre Dame with a commanding 40-13 victory! What a statement win for the Rebels!

Looking at the Legacy Points leaders, MISS continues to hold the top spot with an incredible 240.7 LP, followed closely by TEX at 232.77 and OSU at 231.51. These teams are building legacies that will be talked about for seasons to come!

Now, let's talk about Week 7! We've got a slate that's absolutely packed with must-see matchups. Can Texas Tech pull off another upset against a ranked ASU? Will Miami, ranked #5, handle business on the road against Van? And the marquee matchup of the week has to be #1 Washington taking on #9 Wisconsin in a clash of titans! You won't want to miss a single snap!